Comparison Overview
Atasun Optik
Atasun Optik
Esentepe Mahallesi Keskin Kalem Sokak No:5, İstanbul, İstanbul 34394, TR
Last Update: 24/04/2026
Dünyada 44’ten fazla ülkede, 6.100’den fazla mağazası ve 31.000’den fazla çalışanıyla faaliyet gösteren, bulunduğu pazarların optik perakendesinde lideri konumunda olan Hollandalı GrandVision şirketinin %100 iştiraki Atasun Optik olarak 2007 yılından beri Türkiye’de faa...
Indomaret Group
Jalan Pantai Indah Kapuk Boulevard No.1, Jakarta Utara, 14470, ID
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Originated from the idea to facilitate the provision of employees’ basic daily needs, a store, known as Indomaret, was established in 1988. As the store developed, the Company were interested to further explore and understand the consumers’ various needs and shopping be...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Atasun Optik
Indomaret Group
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Atasun Optik in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Indomaret Group in 2026.
Incident History - Atasun Optik (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Atasun Optik cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Indomaret Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Indomaret Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Atasun Optik
Indomaret Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Improper access control in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
A security vulnerability has been detected in NousResearch hermes-agent up to 2026.4.30. Affected is the function GatewayStreamConsumer._filter_and_accumulate of the file gateway/stream_consumer.py of the component Streaming Reasoning Tag Filter. The manipulation leads to improper handling of case sensitivity. The attack may be initiated remotely. The attack's complexity is rated as high. The exploitability is told to be difficult. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The project decided to not implement a dedicated fix: "[T]he analysis and the fix are both sound. It just lands below the bar for the maintenance cost of a duplicated scrub path."
- https://gist.github.com/YLChen-007/2229e5505bcbb3e15a7ae8fba4c4be37
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/issues/27288
- https://github.com/NousResearch/hermes-agent/pull/28631#issuecomment-4622188016
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-14617
- https://vuldb.com/submit/844654
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/376134/cti
Insufficient ui warning of dangerous operations in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
Relative path traversal in Microsoft Edge for Android allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information locally.