Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » ASUS » ASRASU1769030696

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ASRASU1769030696)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-133
Company Score Before Incident679 / 1000
Company Score After Incident546 / 1000
Company LinkView ASUS Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERASRASU1769030696
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED509GB of sensitive data
INCIDENT DATE20/01/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of ASUS's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts ASUS Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the ASUS breach identified under incident ID ASRASU1769030696.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of ASUS's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/asus, the number of followers: 1019062, the industry type: Computer Hardware Manufacturing and the number of employees: 16975 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 679 and after the incident was 546 with a difference of -133 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on ASUS and their customers.

ASRock Rack recently reported "ASRock Rack Hit by Everest Ransomware Gang, 509GB of Sensitive Data Allegedly Stolen", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

ASRock Rack, the enterprise-focused server and cloud hardware division of ASRock, has been listed on the dark web leak site of the Everest ransomware gang.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 509GB of sensitive data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating aSRock Rack allegedly breached, attack threatening the organizations existence and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating follows Everest’s recent attack on an ASUS supplier. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating confidential technical documentation, firmware, software compromised. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 509GB database containing confidential technical documentation, firmware, etc. and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating file trees with keywords like *data centre* and *diag*. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 509GB of sensitive data allegedly stolen by Everest ransomware gang and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating listed on the dark web leak site of the Everest ransomware gang. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating type such as Ransomware, Everest ransomware gang involved and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating listed on the dark web leak site with data sample. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Lateral Tool Transfer (T1570) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential exploitation of vulnerabilities in hardware and software systems. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Trusted Relationship (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Network Shared Drive (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Defacement (60%)
Lateral Movement
Lateral Tool Transfer (50%)