Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BANSNOATTASO1791289443)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of ASOS.com's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts ASOS.com Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the ASOS.com breach identified under incident ID BANSNOATTASO1791289443.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of ASOS.com's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/asos-com, the number of followers: 756176, the industry type: Retail Apparel and Fashion and the number of employees: 2472 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 694 with a difference of -69 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on ASOS.com and their customers.
Asos recently reported "Asos Customers Targeted in Alleged Snowflake Data Breach Extortion Attempt", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Asos customers received a suspicious notification claiming the online retailer’s Snowflake data storage instance had been compromised.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Snowflake data storage instance (alleged), and exposing Alleged customer data (unconfirmed).
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Ongoing.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating alleged data breach via Snowflake storage instance and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating snowflake data storage instance (supply chain attack). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating alleged compromise of Snowflake data storage instance and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating linked to broader 2024 Snowflake data theft campaign. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Cloud Storage (T1530) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating alleged customer data from Snowflake storage instance. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating threatened to leak data via Telegram channel and Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating linked to broader 2024 Snowflake data theft campaign. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1471) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating extortion attempt with data leak threat and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no confirmation of actual data encryption. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Web Service (T1102) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating telegram channel named Xuanye Wen Gateway for contact. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- ASOS.com Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/asos-com/incident/BANSNOATTASO1791289443
- ASOS.com CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/asos-com
- ASOS.com Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/bansnoattaso1791289443-asos-snowflake-att-santander-breach-january-2024/
- ASOS.com CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/asos-com/history
- ASOS.com CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.theregister.com/security/2026/10/06/asos-app-delivers-a-data-leak-threat-instead-of-fast-fashion/5301332
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf