Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Ascension » ASC1766477123

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ASC1766477123)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-189
Company Score Before Incident797 / 1000
Company Score After Incident608 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERASC1766477123
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORPhishing, Social Engineering
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Ascension's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Ascension Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ascension breach identified under incident ID ASC1766477123.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ascension's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ascensionorg, the number of followers: 292426, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 65854 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 797 and after the incident was 608 with a difference of -189 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ascension and their customers.

Ascension Health recently reported "Ascension Health Ransomware Incident 2024", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A ransomware attack on Ascension Health in 2024 resulted in an estimated financial loss of $1.3 billion, severely impacting operations, patient safety, and financial stability.

The disruption is felt across the environment, plus an estimated financial loss of $1.3 billion.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Cybersecurity is a financial and patient safety imperative. CFOs and CISOs must collaborate closely to align cybersecurity investments with financial resilience, regulatory compliance, and operational continuity. Tabletop exercises, financial reserves, vendor oversight, and strategic cyber insurance are critical for mitigating risks, and recommending next steps like Participate in tabletop exercises to simulate cyber incident responses, Allocate 1–2% of operating expenses for breach response and uninsured costs and Enforce vendor oversight with SOC 2/ISO 27001 attestations and cyber insurance requirements.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Phishing, Social Engineering, Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating phishing & Social Engineering cost healthcare $9.77M per breach, and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating phishing & Social Engineering attack vector. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (95%), with evidence including type such as Ransomware, and data encryption such as Yes and Defacement (T1491) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating operational impact such as Cancelled procedures, Delayed diagnostics. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attacks often involve data exfiltration (implied). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating phishing/social engineering often leads to credential theft (implied). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating phishing/social engineering may compromise valid accounts (implied). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (70%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (95%)
Defacement (50%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (60%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)

Sources & References