Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Artivo Surfaces » ART1766181273

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ART1766181273)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-51
Company Score Before Incident747 / 1000
Company Score After Incident696 / 1000
Company LinkView Artivo Surfaces Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERART1766181273
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personal identifiable information
INCIDENT DATE31/08/2025
STATUSCompleted

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Artivo Surfaces's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Artivo Surfaces Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Artivo Surfaces breach identified under incident ID ART1766181273.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Artivo Surfaces's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/artivo-surfaces, the number of followers: 717, the industry type: Wholesale Building Materials and the number of employees: 52 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 747 and after the incident was 696 with a difference of -51 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Artivo Surfaces and their customers.

On 18 December 2025, Artivo disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Artivo Data Breach".

Artivo reported a data breach where sensitive personal identifiable information may have been compromised.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Artivo's network, and exposing Sensitive personal identifiable information.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Mailed data breach notification letters to impacted individuals.

The case underscores how Completed, and recommending next steps like 12 months of complimentary credit monitoring services for affected individuals, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Data breach notification letters mailed to impacted individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party may have accessed or exfiltrated sensitive data and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating suspicious network activity detected on or around September 1, 2025. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to sensitive personal identifiable information (SSNs, names). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized third party may have... exfiltrated sensitive personal data and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating data management firm with potential cloud storage compromise. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit ransomware details, but high-severity breach (85/100) and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to sensitive data with potential tampering. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (80%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)

Sources & References