Comparison Overview
Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Arrow ECS Finland Oy
Lars Sonckin kaari 16, Espoo, 02600, FI
Last Update: 02/02/2026
Arrow ECS on teknologiayritys, joka tuo markkinoille innovatiivisia IT-ratkaisuja selkeyttämään monimutkaisia liiketoimintahaasteita. Toimitamme lisäarvoa tuottavaa jakelu-, konsultointi- ja kanavapalvelua johtaville teknologiavalmistajille ja kanavakumppaneille. Autamm...

Gainwell Technologies
United States, US
Last Update: 22/05/2026
For 50 years, our nation’s federal Medicaid program has worked to improve the health, safety and well-being of America’s most vulnerable populations: low-income families, women and children, seniors, and those with disabilities. With positive health and cost outcomes th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Arrow ECS Finland Oy







Gainwell Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Arrow ECS Finland Oy in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Gainwell Technologies has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Arrow ECS Finland Oy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Arrow ECS Finland Oy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Arrow ECS Finland Oy

Gainwell Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.