Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Armor Mobile Systems » ARM1773117204

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ARM1773117204)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-173
Company Score Before Incident746 / 1000
Company Score After Incident573 / 1000
Company LinkView Armor Mobile Systems Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERARM1773117204
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonal information of over 357,000...
INCIDENT DATE31/12/2023
STATUSResolved

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Armor Mobile Systems's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Armor Mobile Systems Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Armor Mobile Systems breach identified under incident ID ARM1773117204.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Armor Mobile Systems's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/armor-mobile-systems, the number of followers: 322, the industry type: Motor Vehicle Manufacturing and the number of employees: 17 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 746 and after the incident was 573 with a difference of -173 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Armor Mobile Systems and their customers.

Mobile Mammogram Provider recently reported "Mobile Mammogram Provider Settles $2.5M Over 2024 Data Breach Affecting 357,000 Patients", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A mobile mammogram provider has agreed to a $2.5 million settlement in a proposed class-action lawsuit after a 2024 data breach exposed the personal information of over 357,000 patients.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personal information of over 357,000 patients, with nearly 357,000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $2,500,000.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Resolved.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to patient records and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating breach involved unauthorized access, cause undisclosed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of over 357,000 patients compromised and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to patient records. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of over 357,000 patients exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach affecting 357,000 patients and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to patient records. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating high-profile resolution in healthcare-related cybersecurity and Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of over 357,000 patients compromised. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (70%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (60%)
Valid Accounts (70%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (40%)
Stored Data Manipulation (30%)

Sources & References