Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Arlanis Reply UKArlanis Reply UK
VS
Gainwell TechnologiesGainwell Technologies
Arlanis Reply UK

Arlanis Reply UK

Nova South, 160 Victoria Street, Westminster, SW1E 5LB, GB

Last Update: 20/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.reply.com/arlanis-reply/en/
752/1000Fair

Arlanis Reply is the Reply Group company specializing in Salesforce implementations. Our experience extends not just to the delivery of a single instance of Core Salesforce, but to complex environments which span the entire Salesforce stack (Sales Cloud, Service Cloud, ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:84
Subsidiaries:124
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Gainwell Technologies

Gainwell Technologies

United States, US

Last Update: 05/08/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gainwelltechnologies.com
657/1000Weak

The people who build careers at Gainwell Technologies share one thing: they want their work to matter. Here, it does. We're the essential ingredient that makes Medicaid work. For more than 50 years, we've combined our sweeping scale and technology to turn complex polic...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,047
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Arlanis Reply UK

Arlanis Reply UK

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Gainwell Technologies

Gainwell Technologies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arlanis Reply UK in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Gainwell Technologies has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Arlanis Reply UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arlanis Reply UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Arlanis Reply UK

Arlanis Reply UK

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Gainwell Technologies

Gainwell Technologies

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
HARGAISOC1779481525
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI1992519092625
🔒 Incident : Breach
GAI115225522

FAQ

Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK company and Gainwell Technologies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK and Gainwell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK and Gainwell Technologies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Arlanis Reply UK or Gainwell Technologies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Arlanis Reply UK or Gainwell Technologies ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK and Gainwell Technologies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Arlanis Reply UK and Gainwell Technologies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES