Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ArcelorMittal PolandArcelorMittal Poland
VS
AngloGold AshantiAngloGold Ashanti
ArcelorMittal Poland

ArcelorMittal Poland

ArcelorMittal Poland S. A. Oddział w Dąbrowie Górniczej, Dąbrowa Górnicza, Silesian Voivodeship, 41-308, PL

Last Update: 04/02/2026

View Profile
760/1000Fair

ArcelorMittal Poland is the largest steel producer in Poland, employing about 10 000 people in six plants located in Silesia, Malopolska and Opolskie province. Thanks to the investments, the value of which in 2004-2024 amounted to more than PLN 11 bn, ArcelorMittal Pola...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:979
Subsidiaries:38
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

Greenwood Village, Denver, 80111, US

Last Update: 15/06/2026

View Profile
812/1000Good

AngloGold Ashanti plc is a global gold mining company with a diverse, high-quality portfolio of operations, projects and exploration activities across 10 countries on four continents. We pursue value-creating opportunities involving other minerals, where we can leverage...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:12,992
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ArcelorMittal Poland

ArcelorMittal Poland

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ArcelorMittal Poland in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AngloGold Ashanti in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ArcelorMittal Poland (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ArcelorMittal Poland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AngloGold Ashanti (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AngloGold Ashanti cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ArcelorMittal Poland

ArcelorMittal Poland

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AngloGold Ashanti

AngloGold Ashanti

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland company and AngloGold Ashanti company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ArcelorMittal Poland or AngloGold Ashanti ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ArcelorMittal Poland or AngloGold Ashanti ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ArcelorMittal Poland and AngloGold Ashanti, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-56355
SUMMARY

GNU Savannah Administration Savane through 3.17 uses untrusted data as part of authorization.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-56347
SUMMARY

AVideo TopMenu plugin through version 26.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in menu item rendering due to missing output encoding of icon classes, URLs, and text labels. Attackers can inject malicious JavaScript through unescaped menu item fields that execute for all site visitors, potentially stealing session cookies or performing unauthorized actions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56346
SUMMARY

AVideo through version 25.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability in the decryptMessage.json.php endpoint that allows unauthenticated users to decrypt PGP messages. Remote attackers can submit private keys, ciphertext, and passphrases to perform server-side decryption without credentials, exposing key material to logs and enabling resource exhaustion attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56345
SUMMARY

AVideo through 29.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in the Meet plugin's uploadRecordedVideo.json.php endpoint that derives the target users_id from the uploaded filename without verification. An attacker with knowledge of the Meet shared secret can craft a malicious file upload with a filename containing an arbitrary users_id to invoke passwordless User->login() and establish an authenticated session as any user including admin. Attackers can obtain the Meet shared secret through path-traversal vulnerabilities or timing attacks against checkToken.json.php, then POST a crafted file to uploadRecordedVideo.json.php with a filename like '1-anything.mp4' to hijack admin sessions and gain full account takeover.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-56342
SUMMARY

AVideo through version 27.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/test.php that allows authenticated administrators to read arbitrary URLs via the statsURL parameter, which lacks isSSRFSafeURL() validation and accepts requests to private IP ranges and cloud metadata endpoints. Attackers can exploit this by crafting requests to internal services, cloud metadata endpoints like 169.254.169.254, and localhost to retrieve sensitive information including IAM credentials, internal service responses, and network configuration details.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-20
UPDATED
Date2026-06-20
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3