Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stadArbetsmarknad - Malmö stad
VS
ManpowerGroupManpowerGroup
Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad

Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad

Nobelvägen 66 B, None, Malmö, Skåne, SE, 205 80

Last Update: 16/12/2025

View Profile

Arbetsmarknadsavdelningen rustar, vägleder och matchar arbetssökande Malmöbor till arbete och studier. Alla kan med rätt stöd! Arbetsmarknadsavdelningen är ditt stöd när du behöver rekrytera. Hos oss har du en möjlighet att hitta oupptäckta talanger och hjälpa dem att ...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ManpowerGroup

ManpowerGroup

100 Manpower Place, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, US, 53212

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.manpowergroup.com
654/1000Weak

ManpowerGroup® (NYSE: MAN), the leading global workforce solutions company, helps organizations transform in a fast-changing world of work by sourcing, assessing, developing and managing the talent that enables them to win. We develop innovative solutions for hundreds o...

NAICS:5613
NAICS Definition:Employment Services
Employees:74,247
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad

Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ManpowerGroup

ManpowerGroup

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Staffing and Recruiting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ManpowerGroup in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ManpowerGroup (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ManpowerGroup cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad

Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ManpowerGroup

ManpowerGroup

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
MAN847081825

FAQ

Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad company and ManpowerGroup company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad and ManpowerGroup, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad and ManpowerGroup, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad or ManpowerGroup ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad or ManpowerGroup ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad and ManpowerGroup, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Arbetsmarknad - Malmö stad and ManpowerGroup, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8