Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Aqua Security » AQU1774671948

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AQU1774671948)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-5
Company Score Before Incident592 / 1000
Company Score After Incident587 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERAQU1774671948
Type of Cyber IncidentVulnerability
ATTACK VECTOREmbedded Malicious Code in Security Tool
DATA EXPOSEDAuthentication tokens, SSH keys, cloud...
INCIDENT DATE27/03/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Aqua Security's Vulnerability and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Aqua Security Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Aqua Security breach identified under incident ID AQU1774671948.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Aqua Security's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aquasecteam, the number of followers: 66228, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 481 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 592 and after the incident was 587 with a difference of -5 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Aqua Security and their customers.

Aquasecurity recently reported "Critical Trivy Scanner Vulnerability Added to CISA’s Exploited Flaws Catalog", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

CISA has added CVE-2026-33634, a severe vulnerability in Aquasecurity’s Trivy scanner, to its Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting CI/CD pipelines, development environments, and exposing Authentication tokens, SSH keys, cloud credentials, database passwords.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Discontinue Trivy’s use if patches are unavailable, and began remediation that includes Apply Aquasecurity’s patches, rotate all exposed credentials (cloud tokens, SSH keys, database passwords), while recovery efforts such as Audit cloud environments for suspicious activity continue.

The case underscores how and recommending next steps like Patch Trivy immediately, rotate exposed credentials, audit cloud environments, discontinue use if patches are unavailable.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating flaw allows threat actors to compromise CI/CD pipelines by exploiting the security tool itself and Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating malicious code embedded in Trivy’s architecture (CWE-506). Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating extract authentication tokens, SSH keys, cloud credentials, and database passwords from memory and Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating trivy requires elevated permissions for deep container and IaC analysis. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating successful exploitation grants full control over the development environment. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating cI/CD pipelines are prime targets for supply chain attacks and Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating discontinuing Trivy’s use advised if patches are unavailable. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Subvert Trust Controls (T1553) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating turning a trusted scanning utility into a vector for unauthorized access and Code Signing (T1553.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating embedded malicious code in Trivy’s architecture (CWE-506). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating extract authentication tokens, SSH keys, cloud credentials from memory. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Supply Chain Compromise (90%)
Compromise Software Supply Chain (90%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (90%)
Credentials In Files (80%)
Lateral Movement
Valid Accounts (80%)
Impact
Resource Hijacking (70%)
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (60%)
Defense Evasion
Subvert Trust Controls (90%)
Code Signing (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)

Sources & References