Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AQAAQA
VS
Chicago Public SchoolsChicago Public Schools
AQA

AQA

Devas Street, Manchester, M15 6EX, GB

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.aqa.org.uk
763/1000Fair

At AQA, we’re proud to be the leading provider of accessible qualifications and support services for teachers and students. We set and mark around half of all GCSEs and A-levels taken in the UK every year; we ask the questions that matter, so that every learner can achi...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:4,979
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Chicago Public Schools

Chicago Public Schools

42 West Madison Street, Chicago, 60602, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cps.edu
741/1000Moderate

Chicago Public Schools is looking for teachers, leaders, and non-instructional staff to transform the face of urban education. We are a team of passionate, committed, and talented professionals who believe that every CPS student will graduate prepared for success in col...

NAICS:92311
NAICS Definition:Administration of Education Programs
Employees:37,366
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AQA

AQA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Chicago Public Schools

Chicago Public Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AQA in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Education Administration Programs Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chicago Public Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AQA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AQA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Chicago Public Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chicago Public Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AQA

AQA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
AQA151324822
Chicago Public Schools

Chicago Public Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHI31924522

FAQ

Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AQA company and Chicago Public Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AQA and Chicago Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AQA and Chicago Public Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AQA or Chicago Public Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AQA or Chicago Public Schools ?
Between AQA and Chicago Public Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AQA and Chicago Public Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA