Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Applied Materials KoreaApplied Materials Korea
VS
Applied MaterialsApplied Materials
Applied Materials Korea

Applied Materials Korea

N/A

Last Update: 19/03/2026

View Profile

미국 실리콘밸리에 본사를 둔 어플라이드 머티어리얼즈(Applied Materials)의 한국법인 어플라이드 머티어리얼즈 코리아(Applied Materials Korea)는 최첨단 기술과 글로벌 선진 사례를 국내 공유하고, 국내 기업으로부터 부품을 조달 받으며 지난 한국 IT 산업 발전에 기여해 왔습니다. 1989년 설립되어 반도체를 시작으로 1994년 평판 디스플레이, 2008년 태양전지 등 다양한 분야로 사업을 확장하고 있습니다. 어플라이드 코리아 블로그: https://b...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:101
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Applied Materials

Applied Materials

3050 Bowers Avenue, Santa Clara, CA, US, 95054

Last Update: 30/07/2026

View Profile
801/1000Good

Applied Materials is the leader in materials engineering solutions that are at the foundation of virtually every new semiconductor and advanced display in the world. The technology we create is essential to advancing AI and accelerating the commercialization of next-gen...

NAICS:3344
NAICS Definition:Semiconductor and Other Electronic Component Manufacturing
Employees:32,480
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Applied Materials Korea

Applied Materials Korea

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Applied Materials

Applied Materials

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Applied Materials Korea in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

Applied Materials has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Applied Materials Korea (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Materials Korea cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Applied Materials (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applied Materials cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Applied Materials Korea

Applied Materials Korea

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Applied Materials

Applied Materials

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
APPADV1771962047
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
APP106050824

FAQ

Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Applied Materials Korea company and Applied Materials company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Applied Materials Korea and Applied Materials, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Applied Materials Korea and Applied Materials, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Applied Materials Korea or Applied Materials ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Applied Materials Korea or Applied Materials ?
Between Applied Materials Korea and Applied Materials, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Applied Materials Korea and Applied Materials, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3