Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + BarApplebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar
VS
Burger KingBurger King
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

10 W Walnut St, Pasadena, 91103, US

Last Update: 27/08/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.applebees.com
705/1000Moderate

There's a lot to love about Applebee's! Founded more than four decades ago on the principles of exceptional value and family fun, Applebee’s Neighborhood Grill + Bar serves as America’s kitchen table. As one of the world’s largest casual dining brands, Applebee's provid...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:2,051
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Burger King

Burger King

5505 Blue Lagoon Drive, Miami, FL, US, 33126

Last Update: 21/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.bk.com
750/1000Fair

The year is 1954. Dave and Jim*, two budding entrepreneurs, are on a mission to re-design the perfect broiler, one that will infuse flame-grilled goodness into every burger. And that's how our brand was born. Today the Burger King Corporation, its affiliates and its f...

NAICS:7225
NAICS Definition:Restaurants and Other Eating Places
Employees:127,892
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Burger King

Burger King

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar has 51.92% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Restaurants Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Burger King in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Burger King (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Burger King cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
APP1787799775
🔒 Incident : Breach
APP1749622
Burger King

Burger King

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
MCD344071125
🔒 Incident : Breach
BUR1790000683
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
BUR22818923

FAQ

Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar company and Burger King company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Burger King, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Burger King, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar or Burger King ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar or Burger King ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Burger King, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Applebee's Neighborhood Grill + Bar and Burger King, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9