Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Apple » APPL3H1773147416

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (APPL3H1773147416)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-13
Company Score Before Incident787 / 1000
Company Score After Incident774 / 1000
Company LinkView Apple Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERAPPL3H1773147416
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORWatering-hole attacks, Zero-day exploits
DATA EXPOSEDCryptocurrency wallets, Sensitive user data
INCIDENT DATE31/05/2023
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Apple's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Apple Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Apple breach identified under incident ID APPL3H1773147416.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Apple's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/apple, the number of followers: 18033868, the industry type: Computers and Electronics Manufacturing and the number of employees: 173021 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 787 and after the incident was 774 with a difference of -13 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Apple and their customers.

L3Harris (Trenchant division) recently reported "Advanced iPhone Exploit Kit 'Coruna' Traces Back to U.S. Defense Contractor, Spreads Globally", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

A sophisticated iOS exploit toolkit called Coruna has been linked to L3Harris, a U.S.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting iPhones (iOS 13-17.2.1), and exposing Cryptocurrency wallets and Sensitive user data.

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incident highlights the risks of government-grade hacking tools leaking into broader cybercrime and espionage operations, as well as the rapid proliferation of elite zero-day exploits in underground markets, and recommending next steps like Strengthen insider threat programs for defense contractors, Enhance monitoring of exploit broker activities and Improve collaboration between private sector and government to track exploit proliferation.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with high confidence (90%), with evidence including targeting iPhones...via watering-hole attacks, and single visit to a compromised website can trigger and Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating watering-hole attacks...highly targeted operations. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating 23 exploits across five attack chains...remote code execution. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Escape to Host (T1611) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating sandbox escape...enabling attackers to...kernel compromise and Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating kernel compromise...targeting iPhones running iOS 13 through 17.2.1. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Defense Evasion (T1211) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 23 exploits...zero-day exploits...sandbox escape and Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating sophisticated iOS exploit toolkit called Coruna. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating drain cryptocurrency wallets...steal data. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating steal data, spy on victims, and drain cryptocurrency wallets and Screen Capture (T1113) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating spy on victims...highly targeted operations. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data breach...Russian state hackers...Chinese cybercrime group and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating proliferation via exploit brokers (Operation Zero). Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol (T1071) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remote code execution...kernel compromise...spy on victims. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (T1499.004) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating kernel compromise...targeting iPhones running iOS 13 through 17.2.1 and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating drain cryptocurrency wallets...financial theft. Under the Resource Development tactic, the analysis identified Obtain Capabilities: Tool (T1588.002) with high confidence (95%), supported by evidence indicating coruna toolkit developed in-house by L3Harris...sold exclusively to U.S. government and Develop Capabilities: Malware (T1587.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 23 exploits across five attack chains...sophisticated iOS exploit toolkit. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Drive-by Compromise (90%)
Phishing: Spearphishing Link (70%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (95%)
Privilege Escalation
Escape to Host (90%)
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (90%)
Defense Evasion
Exploitation for Defense Evasion (90%)
Obfuscated Files or Information (70%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (80%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Screen Capture (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Command and Control
Application Layer Protocol (80%)
Impact
Endpoint Denial of Service: Application or System Exploitation (60%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (50%)
Resource Development
Obtain Capabilities: Tool (95%)
Develop Capabilities: Malware (90%)

Sources & References