What is the official website of Apical ?

The official website of Apical is http://www.apicalgroup.com.

What is Apical's cybersecurity risk score?

Apical has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 772 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has Apical experienced?

According to Rankiteo, Apical currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Apical been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Apical has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Apical have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Apical is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Apical have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Apical does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Apical comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Apical is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Apical have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Apical does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Apical comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Apical is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Apical have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Apical is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does Apical operate in ?

Apical operates primarily in the Food Production industry.

How many employees does Apical have ?

Apical employs approximately 2,509 people worldwide.

Does Apical own any subsidiaries ?

Apical presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does Apical have ?

Apical's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 151,372 followers.

Does Apical have a Crunchbase profile ?

Yes, Apical has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/apical-group.

Does Apical have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, Apical maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/apical-group.

How many cybersecurity incidents has Apical experienced ?

As of June 14, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Apical has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does Apical have ?

Apical has an estimated 1,165 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

Apical

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

772

/1000

Fair

797

/1000

Fair

Apical Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

apicalgroup.com

cb in

Add Your Compliance Badge

A leading vegetable oil processor with an expanding global footprint. Our vertically integrated mid-stream refining and value-added downstream processing makes us an integral supplier that supports the food, feed and renewable fuel needs across industries.

Apical A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

Apical

Apical CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

Apical Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for Apical

Incidents vs Food Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apical in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apical in 2026.

Incident Types Apical vs Food Production Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Apical in 2026.

Incident History - Apical (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

Apical Subsidiaries

Apical

Food Production

Website: http://www.apicalgroup.com

Company Size: 1,001-5,000 employees

RGEPaper and Forest Product Manufacturing

BracellPaper and Forest Product Manufacturing

Asia Pacific Rayon (APR)Textile Manufacturing

Woodfibre LNGOil and Gas

Pacific EnergyOil and Gas

SateriTextile Manufacturing

EcoCosy纺织制造业

FINEX™Textile Manufacturing

ASIA SYMBOLPaper & Forest Products

Asian AgriFarming

APRILPaper and Forest Product Manufacturing

Loading…

Apical Similar Companies

Lee Kum Kee

lkk.com

Established in 1888, Lee Kum Kee is an international household name in authentic Asian sauces and condiments, as well as “a symbol of quality and trust”. As a globally renowned Chinese multinational corporation, Lee Kum Kee now offers over 200 types of sauce and condiment to over 100 countries and regions.

Loading…

NEWS

Apical CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

Fig 1: Classifying the apical dendrites of pyramidal cells....

Anatomically and biophysically detailed data-driven neuronal models have become widely used tools for understanding and predicting the behavior and function ...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-12175

SUMMARY

A vulnerability was detected in CodeAstro Student Attendance Management System 1.0. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /attendance-php/Admin/createStudents.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument admissionNumber results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used.

Published

Date2026-06-13

Updated

Date2026-06-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.7)

cvss2

Base Score: 5.8

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 4.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.4

Exploitability

1.2

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-12174

SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in D-Link DCS-935L 1.10.01. This issue affects the function snprintf of the file /web/cgi-bin/greece/rhea of the component HTTP Handler. Such manipulation of the argument data leads to format string. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Published

Date2026-06-13

Updated

Date2026-06-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)

cvss2

Base Score: 9.0

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C

cvss3

Base Score: 8.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-12183

SUMMARY

Nefteprodukttekhnika BUK TS-G Gas Station Automation System 2.9.1 through 2.10.2 on Linux contains an Improper Authentication vulnerability (CWE-287) in the system configuration module. The /php/ajax-login.php endpoint returns userid=1 (administrator) in response to any HTTP POST request that supplies arbitrary credentials (e.g., action=dologin&login=<any_value>&pwd=<any_value>), and subsequent privileged endpoints under /php/ajax-main.php and /modules/* do not validate a server-side session. A remote unauthenticated attacker can invoke any administrative action exposed by the configuration module, including reading and modifying user rules, fuel tank gauges, fuel dispensers, relays, cash registers, bank terminals, fuel cards, price and customer displays, cash collection, and pricing rules.

Published

Date2026-06-13

Updated

Date2026-06-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 9.8

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

cvss4

Base Score: 9.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

5.9

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-6428

SUMMARY

SQL Injection in reports/catalogue_out.pl in Koha Community Koha through 22.11.37, 23.x, 24.x before 24.11.16, 25.05.x before 25.05.11, 25.11.x before 25.11.05, 26.05.x before 26.05.01, and 26.11.x before 26.11.00 allows an authenticated staff user with the Reports module flag to read arbitrary data from the Koha application database via the Filter URL parameter when the Criteria parameter matches /branchcode/. The vulnerable sink in sub calculate concatenates the unmodified Filter request parameter directly into a LIKE clause of the auxiliary $strsth2 statement and executes it via DBI without bound parameters: my $f = @$filters[0]; $f =~ s/\*/%/g; $strsth2 .= " AND $column LIKE '$f' "; This enables error-based SQL injection (e.g., via EXTRACTVALUE) and full read access to sensitive tables including borrowers (password hashes, 2FA secrets, PII), borrower_password_recovery, api_keys, and sessions. Proof of concept (error-based, single request): GET /cgi-bin/koha/reports/catalogue_out.pl?do_it=1&output=screen&Limit=10&Criteria=branchcode&Filter=x'+AND+EXTRACTVALUE(1,CONCAT(0x7e,VERSION(),0x7c,USER(),0x7c,DATABASE(),0x7e))--+- Cookie: CGISESSID=<LIBRARIAN_SESSION> The response body contains the DBI exception leaking the MariaDB version, database user, client IP, and database name, after which arbitrary data can be paged out using LIMIT n,1 / SUBSTRING(...). The vulnerable sink was introduced in commit 6bb77ae3e4 (2008-07-09); CVE-2015-4633 patched the same class in sibling files but did not generalise the fix to reports/catalogue_out.pl. Fixed in Koha 22.11.38, 24.11.16, 25.05.11, 25.11.05, 26.05.01, and 26.11.00 by replacing the raw concatenation with a parameterised placeholder.

Published

Date2026-06-13

Updated

Date2026-06-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)

cvss2

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:N/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 5.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:Y/R:X/V:C/RE:X/U:Amber

Impact Score

4.7

Exploitability

2.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-5513

SUMMARY

The Online Scheduling and Appointment Booking System – Bookly plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'bookly-customer-full-name' cookie in versions up to, and including, 27.2 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Exploitation requires 'Remember personal information in cookies' setting to be enabled (disabled by default).

Published

Date2026-06-13

Updated

Date2026-06-13

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)

cvss3

Base Score: 7.2

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Impact Score

2.7

Exploitability

3.9

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…