Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ANY1770832431)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of ANY.RUN's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts ANY.RUN Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the ANY.RUN breach identified under incident ID ANY1770832431.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of ANY.RUN's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/any-run, the number of followers: 22119, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 375 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 753 and after the incident was 643 with a difference of -110 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on ANY.RUN and their customers.
A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Emergence of BQTLock and GREENBLOOD Ransomware Strains", has drawn attention.
Two advanced ransomware families, BQTLock and GREENBLOOD, have emerged with distinct strategies, complicating detection and response for cybersecurity teams.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Credentials, Screenshots, Sensitive Files.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Detection of early indicators such as unexpected process injections and rapid file modifications is critical. Traditional signature-based defenses are insufficient against these evolving threats, and recommending next steps like Implement behavioral monitoring, update threat intelligence, and watch for anomalous interactions between system processes (e.g., explorer.exe and fodhelper.exe).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating remcos payload...bypasses traditional antivirus and User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating emerged with distinct strategies, complicating detection. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating uAC bypass via fodhelper.exe, gaining elevated privileges and System Services: Service Execution (T1569.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating embedding itself within legitimate system processes such as explorer.exe. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating embedding itself within legitimate system processes to evade detection and Event Triggered Execution: Application Shimming (T1546.011) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating bQTLock...delaying encryption to maximize data theft. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Abuse Elevation Control Mechanism: Bypass User Account Control (T1548.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating uAC bypass via fodhelper.exe, gaining elevated privileges without user interaction. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating masquerading as trusted Windows activity...explorer.exe, Process Injection: Dynamic-link Library Injection (T1055.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating embedding itself within legitimate system processes...unexpected process injections, and Indicator Removal: File Deletion (T1070.004) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating gREENBLOOD...deleting forensic evidence. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Input Capture: Keylogging (T1056.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating harvests credentials and screenshots and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating harvests credentials...before extortion. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Screen Capture (T1113) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating harvests credentials and screenshots and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating credentials, Screenshots, Sensitive Files compromised. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Remote Access Software (T1219) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating remcos payload...bypasses traditional antivirus. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Yes...TOR-based leak site and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating tOR-based leak site for extortion. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating go-based ChaCha8 encryption...data encryption such as Yes and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating rapid file modifications...leaves little time for intervention. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- ANY.RUN Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/any-run/incident/ANY1770832431
- ANY.RUN CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/any-run
- ANY.RUN Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/any1770832431-anyrun-ransomware-february-2026/
- ANY.RUN CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/any-run/history
- ANY.RUN CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cybersecuritynews.com/bqtlock-greenblood-ransomware-attacking-organizations/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf