Comparison Overview
Anko Global

Anko Global
None, None, Melbourne, Victoria, AU, None
Last Update: 21/04/2026
We’re Anko Global: Home of elevated value. We are a product development company bringing innovation and design to everyday living for everyone, everywhere. Our diverse range of products are thoughtfully-curated and designed to be complete category solutions with an aes...

Foot Locker
330 West 34th Street, New York City, New York, US, 10001
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Foot Locker, Inc. is a leading footwear and apparel retailer that unlocks the “inner sneakerhead” in all of us. With approximately 2,500 retail stores in 26 countries across North America, Europe, Asia, Australia, and New Zealand, and a franchised store presence in the ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Anko Global







Foot Locker






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Anko Global in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Foot Locker in 2026.
Incident History - Anko Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Anko Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Foot Locker (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Foot Locker cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Anko Global

Foot Locker
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.