Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Ankama » ANK1777566230

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ANK1777566230)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-85
Company Score Before Incident767 / 1000
Company Score After Incident682 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERANK1777566230
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDFull names, email addresses, partial...
INCIDENT DATE22/04/2026
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Ankama's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Ankama Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Ankama breach identified under incident ID ANK1777566230.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Ankama's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/ankama, the number of followers: 60993, the industry type: Entertainment Providers and the number of employees: 479 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 767 and after the incident was 682 with a difference of -85 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Ankama and their customers.

Ankama recently reported "Ankama Hit by Major Cyberattack, Exposing Hundreds of Thousands of User Accounts", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

French video game publisher Ankama disclosed a significant cyberattack resulting in unauthorized access to user data and account breaches across its popular games, including Dofus and Wakfu.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Dofus, Wakfu game platforms, and exposing Full names, email addresses, partial payment details, order dates, billing countries, purchased items, transaction amounts, with nearly Hundreds of thousands of accounts records at risk.

In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Public disclosure, user advisories.

The case underscores how with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Users warned about phishing scams and targeted fraud attempts.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including some accounts were hijacked, and users reporting lost in-game items, deleted characters and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to user data across its popular games. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process (T1556) with moderate to high confidence (70%), with evidence including accounts were hijacked, and unauthorized changes to user accounts and Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating hundreds of thousands of accounts potentially impacted. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating full names, email addresses, partial payment details compromised and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating order dates, billing countries, purchased items, transaction amounts exposed. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data breach impacting hundreds of thousands of accounts. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating lost in-game items, deleted characters reported by users and Account Access Removal (T1531) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating accounts were hijacked, unauthorized changes made. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating accounts were hijacked, suggesting use of legitimate credentials. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (80%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (60%)
Credential Access
Modify Authentication Process (70%)
Brute Force (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (90%)
Data from Information Repositories (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Impact
Data Destruction (70%)
Account Access Removal (60%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (70%)