Comparison Overview

Anglo-Eastern

VS

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Anglo-Eastern

17/F Kingston International Centre, 19 Wang Chiu Road, Kowloon Bay, Kowloon, Hong Kong, HK, .
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Anglo-Eastern's rich maritime heritage spans over 50 years of ship management, crew management, cruise & leisure management and technical services. We manage a diverse fleet of vessels worldwide on behalf of our global partners, and uniquely offer both cadet and crew training through our highly regarded maritime academy and strategically located training centres. From humble beginnings to industry pioneer, we are always looking to the future yet are never far from our roots, and it is this distinct blend of proactive forward-thinking and traditional values, coupled with our commitment to developing and nurturing our people and communities, that drives Anglo-Eastern and sets us apart from our peers. Leading with integrity and doing the right things the right way are at the heart of our work ethic and the foundation upon which we are able to build trust, drive performance and shape a better maritime future for generations to follow. Join us on our voyage in delivering excellence. ------------------------ IMPORTANT NOTICE | Anglo-Eastern does NOT use agents, and we do NOT charge fees in exchange for employment or AEMA sponsorship. We offer employment and sponsorship based on merit and suitability. Anyone asking for money in exchange for Anglo-Eastern employment or AEMA sponsorship is a fraudster. Please report such scammers and do NOT make any payments to them. COMMUNITY POLICY | We welcome our followers and other members of the LinkedIn community to comment on our posts and express their views. However, we have a zero-tolerance policy regarding comments that are obscene, threatening, discriminatory or of a harassing nature (including trolling), as well as those that intend to purposely mislead through false claims and misinformation, solicit, phish and/or otherwise scam. Such comments may be reported and/or removed at any time without notice.

NAICS: 483
NAICS Definition: Water Transportation
Employees: 13,315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Hapag-Lloyd AG

Ballindamm 25, Hamburg, DE, 20095
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

About Hapag-Lloyd With a fleet of 313 modern container ships and a total transport capacity of 2.5 million TEU, Hapag-Lloyd is one of the world’s leading liner shipping companies. In the Liner Shipping segment, the Company has around 14,000 employees and 400 offices in 140 countries. Hapag-Lloyd has a container capacity of 3.7 million TEU – including one of the largest and most modern fleets of reefer containers. A total of 133 liner services worldwide ensure fast and reliable connections between more than 600 ports on all the continents. In the Terminal & Infrastructure segment, Hapag-Lloyd has equity stakes in 21 terminals in Europe, Latin America, the United States, India and North Africa. Around 3,000 employees are assigned to the Terminal & Infrastructure segment and provide complementary logistics services at selected locations in addition to the terminal activities. Disclaimer This press release contains forward-looking statements that involve a number of risks and uncertainties. Such statements are based on a number of assumptions, estimates, projections or plans that are inherently subject to significant risks, uncertainties and contingencies. Actual results can differ materially from those anticipated in the Company’s forward-looking statements.

NAICS: 483
NAICS Definition: Water Transportation
Employees: 14,724
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anglo-eastern.jpeg
Anglo-Eastern
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapag-lloyd-ag.jpeg
Hapag-Lloyd AG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Anglo-Eastern
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hapag-Lloyd AG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Anglo-Eastern in 2025.

Incidents vs Maritime Transportation Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hapag-Lloyd AG in 2025.

Incident History — Anglo-Eastern (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Anglo-Eastern cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hapag-Lloyd AG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hapag-Lloyd AG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/anglo-eastern.jpeg
Anglo-Eastern
Incidents

Date Detected: 5/2020
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hapag-lloyd-ag.jpeg
Hapag-Lloyd AG
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: email (malicious hyperlinks)
Motivation: data theft (personal data)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Hapag-Lloyd AG company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Anglo-Eastern company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Anglo-Eastern and Hapag-Lloyd AG have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Hapag-Lloyd AG company and Anglo-Eastern company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Anglo-Eastern company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Hapag-Lloyd AG company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Hapag-Lloyd AG company nor Anglo-Eastern company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Hapag-Lloyd AG company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Anglo-Eastern company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Anglo-Eastern company nor Hapag-Lloyd AG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Anglo-Eastern company nor Hapag-Lloyd AG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Hapag-Lloyd AG company employs more people globally than Anglo-Eastern company, reflecting its scale as a Maritime Transportation.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Anglo-Eastern nor Hapag-Lloyd AG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H