Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Chile - Anglo AmericanChile - Anglo American
VS
BHPBHP
Chile - Anglo American

Chile - Anglo American

Isidora Goyenechea 2800, Torre Titanium, piso 46, Santiago, 7550647, CL

Last Update: 28/11/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

Bienvenidos al sitio web oficial de Anglo American en Chile. Somos una de las mineras diversificadas más grandes en el mundo, con 158.900 empleados y contratistas en cinco continentes.

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:7
Subsidiaries:12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BHP

BHP

171 Collins Street, Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 19/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bhp.com/
801/1000Good

We are supplying the resources the world needs to help build a better, clearer future. Copper for renewable energy. Potash for sustainable farming. Iron ore and metallurgical coal for the steel needed for global infrastructure and the energy transition. #FutureIsClear ...

NAICS:212
NAICS Definition:Mining (except Oil and Gas)
Employees:40,388
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Chile - Anglo American

Chile - Anglo American

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BHP

BHP

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chile - Anglo American in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Mining Industry Avg (This Year)

BHP has 0.99% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Chile - Anglo American (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chile - Anglo American cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BHP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BHP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Chile - Anglo American

Chile - Anglo American

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BHP

BHP

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TELKIWALDBHP1783413728

FAQ

Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Chile - Anglo American company and BHP company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Chile - Anglo American and BHP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Chile - Anglo American and BHP, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Chile - Anglo American or BHP ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Chile - Anglo American or BHP ?
Between Chile - Anglo American and BHP, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Chile - Anglo American and BHP, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-84411
SUMMARY

The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105051
SUMMARY

Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 1.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
0.5
CVE-2026-105050
SUMMARY

PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-105049
SUMMARY

Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105048
SUMMARY

The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-02
UPDATED
Date2026-10-02
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2