Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Anchor Computer, Inc. » ANC1765382794

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ANC1765382794)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-73
Company Score Before Incident754 / 1000
Company Score After Incident681 / 1000
Company LinkView Anchor Computer, Inc. Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERANC1765382794
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORUnauthorized Access
DATA EXPOSEDSensitive personally identifiable information
INCIDENT DATE11/09/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Anchor Computer, Inc.'s Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Anchor Computer, Inc. Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Anchor Computer, Inc. breach identified under incident ID ANC1765382794.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Anchor Computer, Inc.'s information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/anchor-computer, the number of followers: 882, the industry type: Information Services and the number of employees: 59 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 681 with a difference of -73 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Anchor Computer, Inc. and their customers.

On 04 December 2025, Anchor Computer Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "Anchor Computer Data Breach Investigation".

Shamis & Gentile P.A.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Anchor Computer's network systems, and exposing Sensitive personally identifiable information, with nearly 3275 (Washington state only, subject to change) records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Network secured, and stakeholders are being briefed through Dedicated helpline provided (1-833-707-0407).

The case underscores how Ongoing, and recommending next steps like Sign up for identity theft protection services if offered, Monitor financial statements for suspicious activity and Place a fraud alert and request credit reports from major bureaus, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Dedicated helpline provided for affected individuals.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to the company’s systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack vector such as Unauthorized Access (implied external entry). Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including data exfiltration such as Possible, and sensitive personally identifiable information may have been exposed. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access (implies compromised credentials or misconfigurations). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating high identity theft risk (implies data exposure, though no explicit destruction) and Data Manipulation: Transmitted Data Manipulation (T1565.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating sensitive information may have been exposed (potential tampering). These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Sources & References