Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Anatel » BRAANA1782398135

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (BRAANA1782398135)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-19
Company Score Before Incident763 / 1000
Company Score After Incident744 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERBRAANA1782398135
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORCompromised credentials
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE19/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Anatel's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Anatel Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Anatel breach identified under incident ID BRAANA1782398135.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Anatel's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/anatelgovbr, the number of followers: 97266, the industry type: Telecommunications and the number of employees: 1655 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 763 and after the incident was 744 with a difference of -19 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Anatel and their customers.

On 21 October 2023, National Telecommunications Agency (Anatel) disclosed Unauthorized Access issues under the banner "Brazil’s Emergency Alert System Hacked, Sending Fake Warnings Nationwide".

Brazil’s emergency alert system was disrupted after a cyberattack triggered false alarms across multiple regions.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting National Civil Defense warning platform, emergency alert system.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like System taken offline, and stakeholders are being briefed through Local civil defense teams confirmed no legitimate alerts were issued.

The case underscores how Ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as Critical vulnerabilities in emergency infrastructure due to outdated security practices, including unchanged credentials, lack of multi-factor authentication, and reliance on static security questions, and recommending next steps like Implement multi-factor authentication, enforce regular password updates, replace static security questions with dynamic security measures, and enhance monitoring of government systems, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Local civil defense teams confirmed no legitimate alerts were issued.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating government employee’s computer was infected with infostealer malware, exposing their credentials and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating compromised government system managed by Anatel. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating infostealer malware infection, exposing their credentials and Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating password identical to the username had never been updated. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating national Civil Defense warning platform taken offline to investigate the breach and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating relying on compromised government employee credentials. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating fake emergency alert labeled Extreme Alert with misantropi4 sent nationwide and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating system taken offline at 1 such as 30 a.m. local time, leaving it disabled. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (90%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Credential Access
Credentials from Password Stores (80%)
Brute Force: Password Guessing (60%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (70%)
Valid Accounts (80%)
Impact
Defacement: Internal Defacement (90%)
Service Stop (80%)