Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Analog Devices » ANAMIC1785423158

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ANAMIC1785423158)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-37
Company Score Before Incident818 / 1000
Company Score After Incident781 / 1000
Company LinkView Analog Devices Profile
INCIDENT NUMBERANAMIC1785423158
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDTrue
INCIDENT DATE22/06/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Analog Devices's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Analog Devices Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Analog Devices breach identified under incident ID ANAMIC1785423158.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Analog Devices's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/analog-devices, the number of followers: 547153, the industry type: Semiconductor Manufacturing and the number of employees: 27612 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 818 and after the incident was 781 with a difference of -37 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Analog Devices and their customers.

On 26 July 2026, Analog Devices, Inc. (ADI) disclosed Data Breach and Extortion issues under the banner "Analog Devices Data Breach and Extortion Threat".

Analog Devices, Inc.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing True, with nearly 570,000 (claimed by ExfilSquad) records at risk.

In response, teams activated the incident response plan.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its systems on June 23, 2026 and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating no details on attack vector, but unauthorized access detected. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials (T1552) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its systems implies credential compromise. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating hackers exfiltrated certain files from its systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating hackers exfiltrated certain files; 570,000 records claimed stolen and Exfiltration Over Web Service (T1567) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating extortion group ExfilSquad known for data theft. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement (T1491) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating extortion group ExfilSquad listed ADI on leak site and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1471) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no evidence of ransomware, but extortion threat exists. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Valid Accounts (60%)
Credential Access
Unsecured Credentials (50%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Exfiltration Over Web Service (70%)
Impact
Defacement (40%)
Data Encrypted for Impact (30%)

Sources & References