Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AME1213612112525)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of American Addiction Centers's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts American Addiction Centers Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the American Addiction Centers breach identified under incident ID AME1213612112525.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of American Addiction Centers's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/american-addiction-centers, the number of followers: 31053, the industry type: Hospitals and Health Care and the number of employees: 734 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 765 and after the incident was 627 with a difference of -138 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on American Addiction Centers and their customers.
On 21 November 2024, American Addiction Centers Inc. disclosed Data Breach issues under the banner "American Addiction Centers Data Breach Settlement".
American Addiction Centers Inc.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Internal computer systems, and exposing Personal information of ~423,000 individuals, with nearly 423,000 records at risk, plus an estimated financial loss of $2.75 million (settlement).
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through Notification to 423,000 affected individuals; court filing for settlement approval.
The case underscores how Settled (pending court approval), with advisories going out to stakeholders covering Notification sent to 423,000 affected individuals regarding potential compromise of personal information and eligibility for settlement benefits.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party gained access to the company’s internal computer systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating vulnerabilities in the company’s cybersecurity measures (implied public-facing entry). Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating personal information of ~423,000 individuals exposed from internal systems. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over Alternative Protocol (T1048) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration such as Likely (unauthorized access to internal systems). Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating no explicit destruction, but high identity theft risk implies misuse of exfiltrated data and Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with lower confidence (10%), supported by evidence indicating no ransomware mentioned, but included due to healthcare sector targeting. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- American Addiction Centers Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/american-addiction-centers/incident/AME1213612112525
- American Addiction Centers CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/american-addiction-centers
- American Addiction Centers Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/ame1213612112525-american-addiction-centers-inc-breach-june-2024/
- American Addiction Centers CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/american-addiction-centers/history
- American Addiction Centers CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/american-addiction-centers-to-pay-2-75-million-over-data-breach
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf