Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Amazon Fashion & SportsAmazon Fashion & Sports
VS
Forever 21Forever 21
Amazon Fashion & Sports

Amazon Fashion & Sports

1 Principal Place, London, EC2A 2BA, GB

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
768/1000Fair

At Amazon Fashion & Sports, we don't just support your business, we can help take it to the next level. With our technology, fulfilment network, and e-commerce expertise, you can devote yourself to what you love most—whether that's crafting exciting collections, creatin...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:89
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Forever 21

Forever 21

3880 Mission Road, Los Angeles, 90031, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.forever21.com
727/1000Moderate

Forever 21 continues to be a fashion industry leader with a mission to make the latest trends accessible to all. F21 persists on staying ahead of innovation and providing styles and fit that our customers love. While reinventing for now and beyond, we’re seeking passion...

NAICS:448
NAICS Definition:Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
Employees:19,346
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Amazon Fashion & Sports

Amazon Fashion & Sports

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Forever 21

Forever 21

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Amazon Fashion & Sports in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Apparel and Fashion Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Forever 21 in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Amazon Fashion & Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Fashion & Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Forever 21 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Forever 21 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Amazon Fashion & Sports

Amazon Fashion & Sports

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Forever 21

Forever 21

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
FOR22111923
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FOR612072625
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FOR801050924

FAQ

Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports company and Forever 21 company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports and Forever 21, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports and Forever 21, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Amazon Fashion & Sports or Forever 21 ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Amazon Fashion & Sports or Forever 21 ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports and Forever 21, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Amazon Fashion & Sports and Forever 21, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA