Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AMAWIZ1768515615)

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise: Compromise Software Supply Chain (T1195.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating aWS CodeBuild misconfiguration could have enabled supply chain attacks and Trusted Relationship (T1199) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating exploited predictable GitHub actor IDs to match trusted maintainers. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Serverless Execution (T1648) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attackers could trigger builds in AWS CodeBuild to execute malicious actions. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Steal Application Access Token (T1528) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating leak GitHub admin tokens including Personal Access Token (PAT) for privileged access and Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating gitHub admin tokens and repository secrets were at risk of exposure. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts: Cloud Accounts (T1078.004) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating pAT for aws-sdk-js-automation user granted full repository control. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Modify Authentication Process: Multi-Factor Authentication (T1556.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating insecure regex patterns allowed bypass of webhook restrictions and Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating bot accounts with predictable IDs matched trusted maintainers IDs. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Use Alternate Authentication Material: Application Access Token (T1550.001) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating gitHub admin tokens could enable access to multiple repositories. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Code Repositories (T1213.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating potential secrets exfiltration from AWS-managed GitHub repositories. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating potential exfiltration of repository secrets and privileged credentials. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Resource Hijacking (T1496) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating malicious code injection could affect millions of AWS environments and Network Denial of Service: Direct Network Flood (T1498.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating potential platform-wide compromise of AWS services. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.