Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ALUCOBOND® IndiaALUCOBOND® India
VS
Dabur India LimitedDabur India Limited
ALUCOBOND® India

ALUCOBOND® India

Solitaire Corporate Park, Guru Hargovindji Rd, Andheri East, Mumbai, Maharashtra, Mumbai, 400093, IN

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.alucobond.in
760/1000Fair

ALUCOBOND® India is the Indian arm of 3A Composites, a global pioneer in aluminium composite material (ACM/ACP) with over 50 years of international expertise. Backed by German engineering and Swiss precision from our parent company Schweiter Technologies, we deliver pre...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:21
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Dabur India Limited

Dabur India Limited

Kaushambi, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, IN, 201010

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dabur.com
785/1000Fair

We are Dabur, an Indian Transnational offering the best nature-based solutions to provide holistic Health & Well-Being to households in more than 120 markets spanning Asia, Europe and The US. A world leader in Ayurveda, we are a family of over 7,000 individuals continuo...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:10,383
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ALUCOBOND® India

ALUCOBOND® India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Dabur India Limited

Dabur India Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALUCOBOND® India in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dabur India Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ALUCOBOND® India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALUCOBOND® India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Dabur India Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dabur India Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ALUCOBOND® India

ALUCOBOND® India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Dabur India Limited

Dabur India Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India company and Dabur India Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India and Dabur India Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India and Dabur India Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ALUCOBOND® India or Dabur India Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ALUCOBOND® India or Dabur India Limited ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India and Dabur India Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ALUCOBOND® India and Dabur India Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2