Comparison Overview
ALTEX Romania

ALTEX Romania
Cladirea O1, etaj 10, Şoseaua Bucuresti Nord, Bucharest, Voluntari 10, Ilfov, RO
Last Update: 19/02/2026
ALTEX is a Romanian investment group founded in 1992 and the market leader in electro-IT retail. Being an omnichannel retailer, Altex Romania offers its customers the opportunity to purchase whenever, wherever and however they want, both online and offline, in more tha...

PUMA Group
PUMA Way 1, Herzogenaurach, DE, 91074
Last Update: 09/09/2026
PUMA is one of the world’s leading sports brands, designing, developing, selling and marketing footwear, apparel and accessories. For more than 75 years, PUMA has relentlessly pushed sport and culture forward by creating fast products for the world’s fastest athletes. P...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

ALTEX Romania







PUMA Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for ALTEX Romania in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for PUMA Group in 2026.
Incident History - ALTEX Romania (X = Date, Y = Severity)
ALTEX Romania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - PUMA Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
PUMA Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

ALTEX Romania

PUMA Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.