Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)
VS
PanasonicPanasonic
Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)

Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)

89 Commercial Blvd, Torrington, 06790, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
725/1000Moderate

Since 1972, Altek Electronics has been a trusted partner in electronic manufacturing, offering comprehensive contract manufacturing solutions across a wide range of industries. Serving sectors such as aerospace, medical devices, and industrial automation, we support th...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:110
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Panasonic

Panasonic

Ooaza Kadoma, 1006, Kadoma-shi, 571-8501, JP

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Founded in 1918, and today a global leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, devices, B2B solutions and energy sectors worldwide, the Panasonic Group switched to an operating company s...

NAICS:335
NAICS Definition:Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees:29,888
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)

Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Panasonic

Panasonic

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Panasonic in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Panasonic (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Panasonic cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)

Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ALT233090125
Panasonic

Panasonic

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
PAN356060525
🔒 Incident : Breach
PAN1349111122
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PAN02215422

FAQ

Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) company and Panasonic company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) and Panasonic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) and Panasonic, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) or Panasonic ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) or Panasonic ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) and Panasonic, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Altek Electronics, Inc. (a Cyient DLM Company) and Panasonic, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9