Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ALL1786569916)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Allied OMS's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Allied OMS Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Allied OMS breach identified under incident ID ALL1786569916.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Allied OMS's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/allied-oms, the number of followers: 2043, the industry type: Medical Practices and the number of employees: 48 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 754 and after the incident was 631 with a difference of -123 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Allied OMS and their customers.
Family Medical Associates of Raleigh recently reported "Five Small Healthcare Organizations Report Data Breaches Exposing Patient Information", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
Five small healthcare providers across the U.S.
The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing protected health information (PHI), personally identifiable information (PII), financial data, medical records, insurance details, government-issued ID numbers, Social Security numbers, payment information.
In response, and stakeholders are being briefed through patient_notifications and regulatory_reporting.
The case underscores how ongoing, teams are taking away lessons such as The incidents highlight ongoing cybersecurity risks in small healthcare organizations, with ransomware and extortion groups increasingly targeting sensitive patient data, with advisories going out to stakeholders covering monitor_for_fraud and credit_monitoring_not_offered.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), with evidence including unauthorized access to an employee email account, and suspicious email activity detected and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized party accessed and stole patient files. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups claiming responsibility. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force: Password Guessing (T1110.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to employee email accounts and Credentials from Password Stores (T1555) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to files containing PHI, PII, and financial data. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery: Domain Account (T1087.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating access to patient files, medical records, and insurance details and Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating files containing PHI, PII, and financial data exfiltrated. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating names, SSNs, medical records, payment info compromised and Email Collection: Remote Email Collection (T1114.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating emails and attachments containing PII copied. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed by ransomware groups and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access and data theft by PEAR group. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups claiming responsibility and Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to internal systems. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access via compromised accounts and Hide Artifacts: Hidden Files and Directories (T1564.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ongoing investigations with no misuse reported. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Allied OMS Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/allied-oms/incident/ALL1786569916
- Allied OMS CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/allied-oms
- Allied OMS Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/all1786569916-arkansas-oral-maxillofacial-surgeons-ransomware-april-2026/
- Allied OMS CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/allied-oms/history
- Allied OMS CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://www.hipaajournal.com/data-breaches-five-small-healthcare-organizations/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf