Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Allianz Zagreb d.d.Allianz Zagreb d.d.
VS
AXAAXA
Allianz Zagreb d.d.

Allianz Zagreb d.d.

Heinzelova 70, Zagreb, HR-10000, HR

Last Update: 02/02/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.allianz.hr
818/1000Good

Allianz je u Hrvatskoj prisutan od 1999. godine, kada njemački Allianz zajedno sa Zagrebačkom bankom preuzima tadašnje Adriatic osiguranje. Nastaje Allianz Zagreb d.d. koji u trenutku preuzimanja ima tržišni udio od 4,6%. U godinama koje slijede, Allianz u Hrvatskoj iz ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:95
Subsidiaries:107
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
AXA

AXA

25, avenue Matignon, Paris, 75008, FR

Last Update: 18/07/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.axa.com
806/1000Good

As one of the largest global insurers, our purpose is to act for human progress by protecting what matters. Protection has always been at the core of our business, helping individuals, businesses and societies to thrive. And AXA has always been a leader, an innovator, ...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:141,854
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Allianz Zagreb d.d.

Allianz Zagreb d.d.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AXA

AXA

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Zagreb d.d. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AXA in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Allianz Zagreb d.d. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Zagreb d.d. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AXA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AXA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Allianz Zagreb d.d.

Allianz Zagreb d.d.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
AXA

AXA

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AXA12312222

FAQ

Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. company and AXA company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. and AXA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. and AXA, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Allianz Zagreb d.d. or AXA ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Allianz Zagreb d.d. or AXA ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. and AXA, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Allianz Zagreb d.d. and AXA, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1