Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ALDI Stores AustraliaALDI Stores Australia
VS
Advance Auto PartsAdvance Auto Parts
ALDI Stores Australia

ALDI Stores Australia

Sargents Road, Minchinbury , 2770, AU

Last Update: 07/07/2026

View Profile
706/1000Moderate

If you’ve ever been to ALDI, you’ll know we’re not your average supermarket. We’ve never been satisfied with the status-quo or doing things that other supermarkets do. By doing things differently, we can provide top-quality products at the lowest prices. That’s why we c...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:8,191
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Advance Auto Parts

Advance Auto Parts

2635 E. Millbrook Road, Raleigh, NC, US, 27604

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
721/1000Moderate

Advance Auto Parts, Inc. is a leading automotive aftermarket parts provider that serves both professional installers and do-it-yourself customers. As of October 5, 2024, Advance operated 4,781 stores primarily within the United States, with additional locations in Canad...

NAICS:43
NAICS Definition:Retail Trade
Employees:24,307
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
ALDI Stores Australia

ALDI Stores Australia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Advance Auto Parts

Advance Auto Parts

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

ALDI Stores Australia has 46.24% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Advance Auto Parts in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - ALDI Stores Australia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALDI Stores Australia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Advance Auto Parts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Advance Auto Parts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
ALDI Stores Australia

ALDI Stores Australia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TELKIWALDBHP1783413728
Advance Auto Parts

Advance Auto Parts

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
ADV156082025
🔒 Incident : Breach
ADV439072625

FAQ

Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia company and Advance Auto Parts company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia and Advance Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia and Advance Auto Parts, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - ALDI Stores Australia or Advance Auto Parts ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - ALDI Stores Australia or Advance Auto Parts ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia and Advance Auto Parts, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between ALDI Stores Australia and Advance Auto Parts, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-105761
SUMMARY

Dify is an open-source LLM app development platform. Prior to 1.16.0, the PUT /console/api/apps/<app_id>/server endpoint in api/controllers/console/app/mcp_server.py used AppMCPServerController.put() to retrieve an AppMCPServer by the client-supplied server ID without verifying that the server belonged to the requested application and tenant. An authenticated workspace member could therefore change another application's MCP server status and parameters, potentially redirecting data or disabling the service. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-105760
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, a caller can use the request-level media_io_kwargs field to select the GLMGA video backend and supply large values for the fps and max_frames options without a strict work ceiling. GLMGA constructs and deduplicates an attacker-sized pre-decode frame-index list, allowing a compact request and tiny valid video to consume disproportionate CPU time and memory in the shared media-loading executor. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105759
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, the Rust frontend's track_http_metrics middleware records the raw HTTP method token as a Prometheus label for requests reaching registered routes. An unauthenticated attacker can send unique arbitrary method tokens to unguarded routes such as /tokenize, causing Prometheus's Family::get_or_create function to permanently create counter and histogram label sets. Those label sets increase process memory usage and enlarge the /metrics response until the service or monitoring path is exhausted. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-105758
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. From 0.24.0 until 0.30.0, the Qwen2VLVideoBackend and Qwen3VLVideoBackend classes accept request-level values for the media_io_kwargs.video.max_frames and media_io_kwargs.video.fps fields without enforcing server-side ceilings. An unauthenticated caller can submit these values to the /tokenize endpoint, causing the sampler to decode every frame selected from attacker-controlled video input, consume disproportionate frontend memory, and potentially terminate the API process before scheduling or admission control. The Rust frontend is not affected because it rejects the media_io_kwargs field. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-105757
SUMMARY

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models. Prior to 0.30.0, structured-output request failures can escape request-scoped validation and reach the EngineCore fatal-error path. A per-request backend mismatch can re-raise a grammar compilation exception, padding produced by the ngram_gpu speculative-decoding mode can pass a negative token to guidance validation, and the Rust frontend can admit empty structured-output values that the Python frontend rejects, allowing ordinary constrained-generation requests to terminate the shared engine. This issue is fixed in version 0.30.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-05
UPDATED
Date2026-10-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8