Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AlBorg Labs - معامل البرجAlBorg Labs - معامل البرج
VS
UPMCUPMC
AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج

AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج

48 Abdel Moneim Riad giza, mohandessen, EG

Last Update: 19/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.alborglab.com
765/1000Fair

Founded in 1991, Al Borg Laboratories was the first medical-laboratory company in the Middle East to implement a hub-and-spoke business model, allowing it quickly to become the largest privately owned laboratory chain in the region. Through its central lab in Cairo and...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:1,001-5,000
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UPMC

UPMC

US Steel Tower, Pittsburgh, 15219, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
http://www.upmc.com
587/1000Very Poor

UPMC is a world-renowned, nonprofit health care provider and insurer committed to delivering exceptional, people-centered care and community services. Headquartered in Pittsburgh and affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh Schools of the Health Sciences, UPMC is sh...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:42,506
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج

AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UPMC

UPMC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

UPMC has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UPMC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UPMC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج

AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UPMC

UPMC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UPM1773786562
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UPMNOR1773678972
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
UPM2344101122

FAQ

Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج company and UPMC company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج and UPMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج and UPMC, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج or UPMC ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج or UPMC ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج and UPMC, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AlBorg Labs - معامل البرج and UPMC, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-90461
SUMMARY

OpenStack Ironic through 38.0.0 may send a username and password to an unexpected remote host when Image Service is configured for HTTP(S) Basic Authentication.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-90460
SUMMARY

An issue was discovered in OpenStack Keystone before 29.0.3. Tokens obtained via delegated authentication methods (EC2 credentials, application credentials, OAuth1 access tokens, and trusts) are not blocked from creating, modifying, or deleting credentials via the /v3/credentials API. EC2-derived tokens can additionally read credential blobs, exposing TOTP MFA seeds and other secrets. Also, PATCH /v3/credentials does not validate the requested post-update project_id, allowing any delegated token to move a credential to an unauthorized project. All Keystone deployments using delegated authentication are affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90457
SUMMARY

The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90456
SUMMARY

An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-90455
SUMMARY

A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-11
UPDATED
Date2026-09-11
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA