Comparison Overview

Al Baraka Group (ABG)

VS

RBC Capital Markets

Al Baraka Group (ABG)

Building: 372، Road: 4611، Sea Front 346 Manama, Bahrain Bay, BH
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 700 and 749

Al Baraka Group B.S.C. (c) is licensed as an Investment Business Firm – Category 1 (Islamic Principles) by the Central Bank of Bahrain. It is a leading international Islamic financial group providing financial services through its banking subsidiaries in 13 countries offering retail, corporate, treasury and investment banking services, strictly in accordance with the principles of Islamic Shari'a. The Group has a wide geographical presence with operations in Jordan, Egypt, Tunisia, Bahrain, Sudan, Turkey, South Africa, Algeria, Pakistan, Lebanon and Syria, in addition to two branches in Iraq and a representative office in Libya and provides its services in more than 600 branches. ABG’s network serves a population totaling around one billion customers. The authorized capital of ABG is US$ 2.5 billion. C.R. 48915 - 1

NAICS: 523
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

RBC Capital Markets

Royal Bank Plaza, 200 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5J 2W7
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

RBC Capital Markets is recognized by the most significant corporations, institutional investors, asset managers, private equity firms, and governments around the globe as an innovative, trusted partner with an in-depth expertise in capital markets, banking, and finance. We are well-established in the largest, most mature capital markets across North America, Europe, and the Asia-Pacific region, which collectively encompass more than 75% of global investment banking activity each year. We are part of Royal Bank of Canada (RBC), a leading, diversified provider of financial services and one of the strongest banks globally. Founded in 1864, RBC is the 10th largest bank worldwide and the 5th in North America, as measured by market capitalization. RBC is among a small group of highly rated global banks and is recognized time and time again for its financial strength, market leadership and philanthropic work. For information on our legal terms of use visit https://www.rbccm.com/en/policies-disclaimers.page http://www.rbc.com/legal/

NAICS: 52311
NAICS Definition: Investment Banking and Securities Dealing
Employees: 10,537
Subsidiaries: 18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albaraka.jpeg
Al Baraka Group (ABG)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc-capital-markets.jpeg
RBC Capital Markets
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Al Baraka Group (ABG)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
RBC Capital Markets
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Al Baraka Group (ABG) in 2025.

Incidents vs Investment Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for RBC Capital Markets in 2025.

Incident History — Al Baraka Group (ABG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Al Baraka Group (ABG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — RBC Capital Markets (X = Date, Y = Severity)

RBC Capital Markets cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albaraka.jpeg
Al Baraka Group (ABG)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rbc-capital-markets.jpeg
RBC Capital Markets
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Legitimate Credential Abuse, Social Engineering (Recruitment via Telegram), Insider Access Misuse
Motivation: Financial Fraud, Data Theft for Resale, Potential Espionage (National Security Risk)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

RBC Capital Markets company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Al Baraka Group (ABG) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

RBC Capital Markets company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Al Baraka Group (ABG) company has not reported any.

In the current year, RBC Capital Markets company has reported more cyber incidents than Al Baraka Group (ABG) company.

Neither RBC Capital Markets company nor Al Baraka Group (ABG) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

RBC Capital Markets company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Al Baraka Group (ABG) company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither RBC Capital Markets company nor Al Baraka Group (ABG) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) company nor RBC Capital Markets company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

RBC Capital Markets company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Al Baraka Group (ABG) company.

RBC Capital Markets company employs more people globally than Al Baraka Group (ABG) company, reflecting its scale as a Investment Banking.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Al Baraka Group (ABG) nor RBC Capital Markets holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H