Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Alamo Colleges District » LEHALASOW1775500819

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (LEHALASOW1775500819)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-118
Company Score Before Incident778 / 1000
Company Score After Incident660 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERLEHALASOW1775500819
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED780 GB
INCIDENT DATE08/03/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Alamo Colleges District's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Alamo Colleges District Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Alamo Colleges District breach identified under incident ID LEHALASOW1775500819.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Alamo Colleges District's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/alamo-colleges, the number of followers: 26537, the industry type: Higher Education and the number of employees: 2100 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 778 and after the incident was 660 with a difference of -118 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Alamo Colleges District and their customers.

On 09 March 2026, Community College of Beaver County (CCBC) disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Interlock Ransomware Attack on Community College of Beaver County".

In March 2026, the cybercriminal group Interlock took responsibility for a ransomware attack on Community College of Beaver County (CCBC), encrypting critical data and disrupting access to grades, transcripts, and financial records.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Grades, transcripts, financial records, and exposing 780 GB.

In response, while recovery efforts such as Campus reopened, classes resumed continue.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating interlock claimed to have stolen 780 GB of data, likely requiring access and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attack encrypted critical data and disrupted access to grades, transcripts. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Client Execution (T1203) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack encrypted critical data and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating interlock operates a data leak site, likely using scripts. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating 780 GB of data stolen, including personal records and financial documents. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services (T1021) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating disrupted access to grades, transcripts, and financial records across systems. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 780 GB of data stolen, including personal records, financial documents, and contracts. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating interlock claimed to have stolen 780 GB of data, threatening to release it publicly. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware attack encrypted critical data and disrupted access to grades, transcripts and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating college temporarily closed its campus, with in-person classes resuming only on March 30. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating interlock operates a data leak site, likely using obfuscation to evade detection. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (50%)
Execution
Exploitation for Client Execution (60%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (50%)
Credential Access
OS Credential Dumping (70%)
Lateral Movement
Remote Services (60%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (90%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (70%)
Defense Evasion
Obfuscated Files or Information (60%)

Sources & References