Comparison Overview

U.S. Air Force Reserve

VS

U.S. Coast Guard

U.S. Air Force Reserve

180 Page Road, Bldg 208, Robins AFB, GA, US, 31098
Last Update: 2025-11-27
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://afreserve.com/

The Air Force Reserve is an integral component of our Nation's air defense and military support network. Reservists bring knowledge, skills and expertise from their civilian experiences to support critical missions and training around the globe, while working alongside their Active Duty Air Force members. The Reserve provides the opportunity to live where you serve or serve where you live, while excelling at your civilian career, furthering your education, and serving your country! Call 800-257-1212 or download the AIM HIGH app to learn more about Air Force Reserve opportunities near you.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 19,033
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

U.S. Coast Guard

2703 Martin Luther King Jr. Ave SE, Washington, DC, US, 20593
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uscg.mil

The mission of the U.S. Coast Guard is to protect the public, the environment, and U.S. economic interests — along the coast and our coastal borders, in the nation's ports and waterways, in international waters, or in any maritime region as required to support national security. As one of the six branches of the Armed Forces, the U.S. Coast Guard is vital to our nation's safety and security. U.S. Coast Guard personnel are the backbone of America’s maritime security. The U.S. Coast Guard employs a topnotch civilian workforce, with more than 7,000 positions in nearly 100 locations nationwide. Search for Jobs and Internships at USAJobs.gov.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 31,602
Subsidiaries: 28
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
13
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airforcereserverecruiting.jpeg
U.S. Air Force Reserve
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uscoastguard.jpeg
U.S. Coast Guard
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
U.S. Air Force Reserve
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
U.S. Coast Guard
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Air Force Reserve in 2025.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for U.S. Coast Guard in 2025.

Incident History — U.S. Air Force Reserve (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Air Force Reserve cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — U.S. Coast Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Coast Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airforcereserverecruiting.jpeg
U.S. Air Force Reserve
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/uscoastguard.jpeg
U.S. Coast Guard
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (e.g., unauthorized loans, employment fraud, government benefits fraud)
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

U.S. Coast Guard company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to U.S. Air Force Reserve company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

U.S. Coast Guard company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported any.

In the current year, U.S. Coast Guard company has reported more cyber incidents than U.S. Air Force Reserve company.

U.S. Coast Guard company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Coast Guard company has disclosed at least one data breach, while U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Coast Guard company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported such incidents publicly.

U.S. Coast Guard company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while U.S. Air Force Reserve company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

U.S. Coast Guard company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to U.S. Air Force Reserve company.

U.S. Coast Guard company employs more people globally than U.S. Air Force Reserve company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds HIPAA certification.

Neither U.S. Air Force Reserve nor U.S. Coast Guard holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References