Comparison Overview
AirAsia

AirAsia
AirAsia Berhad, RedQ, Jalan Pekeliling 5, KLIA2, Sepang, Selangor Darul Ehsan, MY, 64000
Last Update: 01/04/2026
It all starts here. 23 years ago, a dream took flight - shaping and forever changing the travel industry in Asia. The idea was simple: Make flying affordable for everyone. We made that dream happen. We started an airline in 2001. Today, we’ve evolved to become somethi...

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Amsterdamseweg 55, Amstelveen, 1182 GP, NL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Welcome to our LinkedIn page! To learn how we can assist you, please check: http://klmf.ly/ContactCentre. KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

AirAsia







KLM Royal Dutch Airlines






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
AirAsia has 51.22% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for KLM Royal Dutch Airlines in 2026.
Incident History - AirAsia (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AirAsia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - KLM Royal Dutch Airlines (X = Date, Y = Severity)
KLM Royal Dutch Airlines cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

AirAsia

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.