Comparison Overview
Aflac
Aflac
1932 Wynnton Rd, Columbus, 31999, US
Last Update: 04/09/2026
Over 50 Million people worldwide have chosen Aflac because of our commitment to providing customers with the confidence that comes from knowing they have assistance in being prepared for whatever life may bring. With Aflac, whether you're a large business or a small o...
Groupama
8-10 rue d'astorg, Paris, 75008, FR
Last Update: 04/09/2026
« Etre là pour les autres, j'ai décidé d'en faire mon métier. » Portée par nos 32 000 collaborateurs, notre campagne de communication employeur souligne ce qui nous rassemble et nous rend fiers au quotidien : notre métier, le point de départ de belles histoires, humain...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Aflac
Groupama
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
Aflac has 88.68% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Groupama in 2026.
Incident History - Aflac (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Aflac cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Groupama (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Groupama cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Aflac
Groupama
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
The web management service in affected RouterOS versions contains an integer underflow in its HTTP request body handling that is reachable before authentication. This can be leveraged by an unauthenticated network attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution as root, or to cause a denial of service, using a single crafted request.
Denuvo Anti-Tamper through 2026-03-04 allows bypass of a hypervisor presence check via CPUID interception (SimpleSvm.sys on AMD; hyperkd.sys and hyperhv.dll on Intel).
PeaZip before 11.3.0, in a non-default configuration, is vulnerable to OS command injection via a filename in an archive because "quotation character already used in the string" is mishandled.
Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 has a Playground feature that does not require authentication for proxying arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests to URLs on the public internet.
The Playground feature of Zilliz Attu before 3.0.0 allows SSRF (proxying of requests to private IP addresses).