Comparison Overview
Afinety

Afinety
12301 Whitewater Dr, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55343, US
Last Update: 13/02/2026
For more than 35 years, Afinety has partnered with law firms to help them drive profitability and growth through smart technology decisions. With Afinety’s managed IT services, clients can securely access critical applications and cloud-based services from any locatio...

Gainwell Technologies
United States, US
Last Update: 22/08/2026
The people who build careers at Gainwell Technologies share one thing: they want their work to matter. Here, it does. We're the essential ingredient that makes Medicaid work. For more than 50 years, we've combined our sweeping scale and technology to turn complex polic...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Afinety







Gainwell Technologies






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Afinety in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
Gainwell Technologies has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Afinety (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Afinety cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Gainwell Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Gainwell Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Afinety

Gainwell Technologies
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
ASE/Kalkitech ASE2000 V2 Communication Test Set 2.35 through 2.37 on Windows contains an improper certificate validation vulnerability in the IEC 60870-5-104 TLS client (Task Mode). This allows a network-positioned attacker to bypass certificate validation via a certificate with multiple simultaneous faults, enabling a Man-in-the-Middle attack on protected communications.
A vulnerability was found in Xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.4.2. Affected by this issue is some unknown functionality of the file xxl-job-admin/src/main/java/com/xxl/job/admin/business/controller/JobGroupController.java. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A vulnerability has been found in openstatusHQ openstatus up to f04c827112f30a11d571ebdad3892826034d6265. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file apps/status-page/src/lib/proxy/resolve-custom-domain-rewrite.ts. The manipulation leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be initiated remotely. This product uses a rolling release model to deliver continuous updates. As a result, specific version information for affected or updated releases is not available. The identifier of the patch is 86f370c9c20074c3c3fdec53a359874b8e670fd4. It is suggested to install a patch to address this issue. This issue got fixed with a silent patch.
- https://github.com/openstatusHQ/openstatus/
- https://github.com/openstatusHQ/openstatus/commit/86f370c9c20074c3c3fdec53a359874b8e670fd4
- https://github.com/openstatusHQ/openstatus/pull/2551
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-90486
- https://vuldb.com/submit/888087
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/403074
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/403074/cti
SEP sesam before 5.2.0.24 mishandles User Authorization with MFA. If AD authentication is configured and MFA is enforced, an attacker can create a second OTP access capability. SEP sesam and Active Directory handle username capitalization differently, which may allow multiple SEP sesam user accounts to be created for the same Active Directory (AD) account. Active Directory treats usernames as case-insensitive, while SEP sesam distinguishes between different letter casing. As a result, the same AD user can be represented by multiple SEP sesam user accounts that differ only in username capitalization. When Active Directory authentication is configured and multi-factor authentication (MFA) is enforced, this behavior may allow an additional OTP Authenticator to be registered for the same AD account, reducing the effectiveness of MFA protection.
A flaw has been found in IOBit Uninstaller 15.5.0.11. Affected by this issue is the function sub_11838 of the file IURegistryFilter.sys of the component IOCTL Dispatch Handler. This manipulation causes null pointer dereference. The attack requires local access. The exploit has been published and may be used. Identical IURegistryFilter.sys ships across multiple IObit families. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.