Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Aerolíneas ArgentinasAerolíneas Argentinas
VS
QantasQantas
Aerolíneas Argentinas

Aerolíneas Argentinas

Av. Rafael Obligao s/n Terminal 4 - Piso 5 - Aeroparque Metropolitano Jorge Newbery, Buenos Aires, C1425DDA, AR

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.aerolineas.com
777/1000Fair

Aerolíneas Argentinas es la compañía líder en el mercado aerocomercial argentino y referente en la región desde 1950. Su flota de 84 aviones alcanza 38 destinos en Argentina y otros 22 a nivel regional e internacional. Con la reciente incorporación de 2 aeronaves de car...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:6,409
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Qantas

Qantas

10 Bourke Road, Mascot, 2020, AU

Last Update: 03/09/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
https://www.qantas.com
100/1000Critical

We would like to acknowledge the Traditional Custodians of the local lands and waterways on which we live, work and fly. We pay our respects to Elders past and present.   Spirit is everything to us, and joining the Qantas team means bringing your spirit to ours. We have...

NAICS:481
NAICS Definition:Air Transportation
Employees:18,076
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
8
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Aerolíneas Argentinas

Aerolíneas Argentinas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Qantas

Qantas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aerolíneas Argentinas in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Airlines and Aviation Industry Avg (This Year)

Qantas has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Aerolíneas Argentinas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aerolíneas Argentinas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Qantas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Qantas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Aerolíneas Argentinas

Aerolíneas Argentinas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Qantas

Qantas

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
OPTMEDQAN1784773430
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
LOC1774283448
🔒 Incident : Breach
COU1764518078

FAQ

Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas company and Qantas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas and Qantas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Aerolíneas Argentinas or Qantas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Aerolíneas Argentinas or Qantas ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas and Qantas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Aerolíneas Argentinas and Qantas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8