Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Advantage Media Services » ADV1775083316

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ADV1775083316)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-59
Company Score Before Incident761 / 1000
Company Score After Incident702 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERADV1775083316
Type of Cyber IncidentBreach
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSEDPersonally identifiable information (PII) such...
INCIDENT DATE07/09/2025
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Advantage Media Services's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Advantage Media Services Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Advantage Media Services breach identified under incident ID ADV1775083316.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Advantage Media Services's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/advantage-media-services, the number of followers: 12, the industry type: Advertising Services and the number of employees: 11 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 761 and after the incident was 702 with a difference of -59 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Advantage Media Services and their customers.

Advantage Media Services LLC (AMS) recently reported "Advantage Media Services LLC Suffers Data Breach, Exposing Sensitive Customer Information", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.

In September 2025, Advantage Media Services LLC (AMS), a Columbus, Ohio-based advertising and media agency, detected unauthorized access to its computer systems.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing Personally identifiable information (PII) such as names, addresses, financial account details, and Social Security numbers.

In response, moved swiftly to contain the threat with measures like Isolating affected systems, resetting passwords, and began remediation that includes Enhancing threat detection measures.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to its computer systems and Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating attacker copying undisclosed data from the company’s servers. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Brute Force (T1110) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating resetting passwords as a containment measure and OS Credential Dumping (T1003) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating exposure of financial account details and SSNs. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating attacker copying undisclosed data from the company’s servers and Data from Information Repositories (T1213) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating pII such as names, addresses, financial account details. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed in incident details and Transfer Data to Cloud Account (T1537) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating attacker copying undisclosed data from servers. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Destruction (T1485) with lower confidence (30%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access to computer systems and Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (T1565.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating potential fallout for individuals whose information was compromised. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unauthorized access detected after the fact and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating enhancing threat detection measures post-breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Valid Accounts (60%)
Exploit Public-Facing Application (40%)
Credential Access
Brute Force (50%)
OS Credential Dumping (40%)
Collection
Data from Local System (80%)
Data from Information Repositories (70%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)
Transfer Data to Cloud Account (50%)
Impact
Data Destruction (30%)
Data Manipulation: Stored Data Manipulation (40%)
Defense Evasion
Valid Accounts (60%)
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (50%)

Sources & References