Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (ADOBPO1775190288)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of Adobe's Breach and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts Adobe Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Adobe breach identified under incident ID ADOBPO1775190288.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Adobe's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/adobe, the number of followers: 5238882, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 41618 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 728 and after the incident was 674 with a difference of -54 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Adobe and their customers.
Adobe recently reported "Adobe Allegedly Breached by 'Mr. Raccoon' via Third-Party BPO Firm", a noteworthy cybersecurity incident.
A threat actor known as Mr.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Adobe support ticketing platform, third-party BPO firm systems, and exposing 13 million support tickets, 15,000 employee records, all HackerOne bug bounty submissions, internal documents, with nearly 13 million support tickets, 15,000 employee records records at risk.
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how teams are taking away lessons such as Risks in third-party vendor security, privileged access management, and overly permissive data export functions in enterprise systems, and recommending next steps like Stricter controls over contractor access pathways, enhanced monitoring of third-party vendors, and implementation of rate-limiting and access controls for data export functions.
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Supply Chain Compromise (T1195) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exploited a supply chain vulnerability via a third-party Indian BPO firm and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating deploying a Remote Access Tool (RAT) via a malicious email to a BPO employee. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating malicious email to a BPO employee...deploying a Remote Access Tool (RAT). Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Phishing: Spearphishing Link (T1566.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating escalated privileges by phishing the employee’s manager. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Adversary-in-the-Middle (T1557) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating whatsApp message interception on the compromised machine. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 13 million support tickets...15,000 employee records...HackerOne bug bounty submissions and Automated Collection (T1119) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating allowed bulk data extraction without proper rate-limiting or access controls. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating exfiltrating a vast trove of sensitive data...data exfiltration such as Yes. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating unpublished vulnerabilities from the stolen HackerOne reports and Disk Wipe: Disk Structure Wipe (T1561.002) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no details on malware’s origin or extent of breach. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- Adobe Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/adobe/incident/ADOBPO1775190288
- Adobe CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/adobe
- Adobe Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/adobpo1775190288-adobe-indian-business-process-outsourcing-breach-april-2026/
- Adobe CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/adobe/history
- Adobe CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cybersecuritynews.com/adobe-breach/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf