AOUSC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
AOUSC
Company Information
Website:http://www.uscourts.gov
Employees number:829
Number of followers:5,162
NAICS:92211
Industry Type:Administration of Justice
Homepage:uscourts.gov
AOUSC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
AOUSCAdministration of Justice
Updated:
04/04/2026
04/04/2026
589/1000
Very Poor
Ca
AOUSC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
AOUSCAdministration of Justice
Score locked

AOUSCVery Poor
Current Score
589Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
5 incidents
-69 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
600
JUNE 2026
599
MAY 2026
593
APRIL 2026
591
MARCH 2026
588
FEBRUARY 2026
584
JANUARY 2026
581
DECEMBER 2025
574
NOVEMBER 2025
573
OCTOBER 2025
569
SEPTEMBER 2025
564
AUGUST 2025
627
Breach
15 Aug 2025 • AOUSC
U.S. Federal Judiciary (CM/ECF and PACER systems)
Cyber Intrusion into U.S. Federal Judiciary’s CM/ECF and PACER Systems
558
CRITICAL-69
ADM831081625
The U.S. federal judiciary’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) and PACER systems suffered a sweeping cyber intrusion, exposing sensitive, unclassified data, including witness identities and ongoing criminal investigation details. The breach was exploited by multiple threat actors, including Latin American drug cartels and nation-states, some of whom maintained persistent access for extended periods. The stolen data poses severe risks, as cartels could weaponize the information—potentially endangering witnesses, compromising investigations, or leveraging it for blackmail and coercion. The incident underscores systemic vulnerabilities in federal cybersecurity, exacerbated by the democratization of hacking tools, which lower the barrier for sophisticated attacks. The reactive 'education-by-breach' approach of U.S. agencies has proven inadequate against such diverse, persistent threats, necessitating a centralized, proactive response like shared incident case studies and coordinated security uplifts. The breach not only jeopardizes national security but also erodes public trust in judicial and law enforcement institutions.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JULY 2025
644
Cyber Attack
04 Jul 2025 • AOUSC
U.S. Federal Judiciary
Cyberattack on U.S. Federal Judiciary's Electronic Case Management Systems
623
CRITICAL-21
ADM805080825
The U.S. Federal Judiciary confirmed a cyberattack on its electronic case management systems, which host confidential court documents. While most documents are public, sealed filings containing sensitive information, including identities of confidential informants, were exposed. The attack targeted CM/ECF and PACER, the backbone of federal court document management. The Judiciary is enhancing security measures to block future attacks and mitigate the impact on litigants. The breach was discovered on July 4, 2025, and involved sophisticated and persistent cyber threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JUNE 2024
676
Breach
16 Jun 2024 • AOUSC
U.S. Federal Courts
Cyberattack on U.S. Federal Court's Case Management System
607
CRITICAL-69
ADM806080825
The U.S. federal court system experienced a major cyberattack on its case management system, PACER, which contains highly sensitive and sealed documents. The attack exposed vulnerabilities that could have led to the exposure of confidential informants' identities in criminal cases. Officials reported blocking around 200 million harmful cyber events in the 2024 fiscal year, highlighting the persistent and sophisticated nature of the threats. The judiciary is prioritizing security enhancements to mitigate future risks and protect sensitive information.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JANUARY 2024
728
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2024 • AOUSC
United States Courts (Federal Court Network)
Scattered Spider Cybercriminal Operation Extorts $115M, Breaches U.S. Federal Court Network
664
CRITICAL-64
ADM4102141092025
The Scattered Spider cybercriminal group, led by Thalha Jubair (19), breached the U.S. Federal Court Network in January 2024 via a helpdesk password reset attack. After gaining access, the group compromised multiple accounts, including those of a federal judge, and stole sensitive personnel data—names, usernames, phone numbers, titles, and work locations of thousands of court employees. They also searched for subpoenas related to their group and attempted unauthorized access to another magistrate judge’s account. Additionally, they used a compromised account to request emergency disclosure of customer financial data from a third-party provider. The breach exposed highly sensitive judicial and administrative records, risking operational disruption, reputational damage, and potential misuse of stolen identities. The attack was part of a broader campaign where Scattered Spider extorted over $115 million from victims, employing ransomware and data theft tactics. The breach threatened the integrity of federal judicial operations, with implications for national security given the targeting of judges and court systems.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
JUNE 2020
764
Breach
16 Jun 2020 • AOUSC
United States Federal Judiciary (CM/ECF System)
Breach of the United States Federal Judiciary’s Electronic Case Filing System (CM/ECF)
689
CRITICAL-75
ADM758081525
A breach in the United States federal judiciary’s CM/ECF (Case Management/Electronic Case Files) system, discovered around July 4, compromised sealed court records, potentially exposing the identities of confidential informants and cooperating witnesses across multiple states. The attack forced some courts to revert to paper-filing backups, disrupting judicial operations. Reports suggest Russia-linked hackers exploited unpatched software vulnerabilities—some dating back five years—from a prior 2020 breach under the Trump administration. The exposed data may include criminal dockets, arrest warrants, and sealed indictments, though the full scope remains unclear over a month after detection. Security experts criticize the lack of transparency and insufficient logging to reconstruct the attack, raising concerns about repeated targeting of a critical judicial system. The breach risks endangering lives (e.g., witnesses in sensitive cases) and undermining public trust in federal judicial security.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
MOTIVATION
IMPACT
DATA BREACH
REFERENCES
Frequently Asked Questions
?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for AOUSC ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ??
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ??
What is the average per-incident point impact on AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ??
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with AOUSC ??
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ??
Where can I view AOUSC's profile page on Rankiteo ??
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?