Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Administrative Office of the United States Courts

Administrative Office of the United States Courts Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

uscourts.gov

The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO) is the administrative arm of the federal Judiciary, and provides a broad range of legislative, legal, financial, technology, management, and program support services to federal courts. The Administrative Office is responsible for carrying out policies approved by the Judicial Conference, the federal Judiciary’s policy-making body. The AO also provides staff support and counsel to the Judicial Conference and its committees. The diverse group of employees strives to be the most effective service organization in government – a team that is trusted, respected, and accountable. We invite you to learn more about us and join the people who work to help ensure equal justice under the law.


AOUSC A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

AOUSC
Company Information
Website:http://www.uscourts.gov
Employees number:829
Number of followers:5,162
NAICS:92211
Industry Type:Administration of Justice
Homepage:uscourts.gov
AOUSC Risk Score (AI oriented)
Between 550 and 599
logo
AOUSCAdministration of Justice
Updated:
04/04/2026
589/1000
Very Poor
Ca
AaaAaABaaBaBCaaCaC
Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
Insurance prefers TPRM score to calculate premium
AOUSC Global Score (TPRM)
xxxx
logo
AOUSCAdministration of Justice
•••
Score locked
Instant access to detailed risk factors
Vulnerabilities
Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
Findings

AOUSC
AOUSCVery Poor
Current Score
589Ca (VERY POOR)
01000
5 incidents
-69 avg impact
Incident timeline with MITRE ATT&CK tactics, techniques, and mitigations.
JULY 2026
600Before Incident
JUNE 2026
599Before Incident
MAY 2026
593Before Incident
APRIL 2026
591Before Incident
MARCH 2026
588Before Incident
FEBRUARY 2026
584Before Incident
JANUARY 2026
581Before Incident
DECEMBER 2025
574Before Incident
NOVEMBER 2025
573Before Incident
OCTOBER 2025
569Before Incident
SEPTEMBER 2025
564Before Incident
AUGUST 2025
627Before Incident
Breach
15 Aug 2025AOUSC
U.S. Federal Judiciary (CM/ECF and PACER systems)

Cyber Intrusion into U.S. Federal Judiciary’s CM/ECF and PACER Systems

558After Incident
CRITICAL-69
ADM831081625
The U.S. federal judiciary’s Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) and PACER systems suffered a sweeping cyber intrusion, exposing sensitive, unclassified data, including witness identities and ongoing criminal investigation details. The breach was exploited by multiple threat actors, including Latin American drug cartels and nation-states, some of whom maintained persistent access for extended periods. The stolen data poses severe risks, as cartels could weaponize the information—potentially endangering witnesses, compromising investigations, or leveraging it for blackmail and coercion. The incident underscores systemic vulnerabilities in federal cybersecurity, exacerbated by the democratization of hacking tools, which lower the barrier for sophisticated attacks. The reactive 'education-by-breach' approach of U.S. agencies has proven inadequate against such diverse, persistent threats, necessitating a centralized, proactive response like shared incident case studies and coordinated security uplifts. The breach not only jeopardizes national security but also erodes public trust in judicial and law enforcement institutions.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber EspionageData BreachUnauthorized Access
MOTIVATION
EspionageCriminal Exploitation (e.g., witness intimidation, investigation sabotage)Financial Gain (potential dark web data sales)Strategic Advantage (nation-state actors)
IMPACT
Witness identitiesDetails of ongoing criminal investigationsSensitive unclassified judicial recordsCase Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF)Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER)Compromised integrity of judicial proceedingsRisk to witness safetyErosion of trust in federal judiciary cybersecuritySevere damage to public trust in U.S. federal judiciary’s ability to protect sensitive dataPerception of systemic cybersecurity failures across federal agenciesHigh (for witnesses and individuals involved in criminal cases)
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable Information (PII) of witnessesCriminal investigation detailsUnclassified judicial recordsHigh (potential to endanger lives, compromise investigations)Confirmed (data stolen by multiple actors)Case filesWitness statementsInvestigation documentsWitness identitiesPossibly addresses, contact details, or other PII linked to criminal cases
JULY 2025
644Before Incident
Cyber Attack
04 Jul 2025AOUSC
U.S. Federal Judiciary

Cyberattack on U.S. Federal Judiciary's Electronic Case Management Systems

623After Incident
CRITICAL-21
ADM805080825
The U.S. Federal Judiciary confirmed a cyberattack on its electronic case management systems, which host confidential court documents. While most documents are public, sealed filings containing sensitive information, including identities of confidential informants, were exposed. The attack targeted CM/ECF and PACER, the backbone of federal court document management. The Judiciary is enhancing security measures to block future attacks and mitigate the impact on litigants. The breach was discovered on July 4, 2025, and involved sophisticated and persistent cyber threats.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyberattack
IMPACT
sensitive case documentsidentities of confidential informantsCM/ECFPACEROperational Impact: Mitigation efforts with courts to reduce impact on litigantsIdentity Theft Risk: High
DATA BREACH
sensitive case documentsidentities of confidential informantsSensitivity Of Data: High
JUNE 2024
676Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2024AOUSC
U.S. Federal Courts

Cyberattack on U.S. Federal Court's Case Management System

607After Incident
CRITICAL-69
ADM806080825
The U.S. federal court system experienced a major cyberattack on its case management system, PACER, which contains highly sensitive and sealed documents. The attack exposed vulnerabilities that could have led to the exposure of confidential informants' identities in criminal cases. Officials reported blocking around 200 million harmful cyber events in the 2024 fiscal year, highlighting the persistent and sophisticated nature of the threats. The judiciary is prioritizing security enhancements to mitigate future risks and protect sensitive information.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyberattack, Data Breach
IMPACT
sensitive documentspotential exposure of confidential informant identitiesPublic Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER)
DATA BREACH
sensitive documentssealed materialsSensitivity Of Data: high
JANUARY 2024
728Before Incident
Cyber Attack
01 Jan 2024AOUSC
United States Courts (Federal Court Network)

Scattered Spider Cybercriminal Operation Extorts $115M, Breaches U.S. Federal Court Network

664After Incident
CRITICAL-64
ADM4102141092025
The Scattered Spider cybercriminal group, led by Thalha Jubair (19), breached the U.S. Federal Court Network in January 2024 via a helpdesk password reset attack. After gaining access, the group compromised multiple accounts, including those of a federal judge, and stole sensitive personnel data—names, usernames, phone numbers, titles, and work locations of thousands of court employees. They also searched for subpoenas related to their group and attempted unauthorized access to another magistrate judge’s account. Additionally, they used a compromised account to request emergency disclosure of customer financial data from a third-party provider. The breach exposed highly sensitive judicial and administrative records, risking operational disruption, reputational damage, and potential misuse of stolen identities. The attack was part of a broader campaign where Scattered Spider extorted over $115 million from victims, employing ransomware and data theft tactics. The breach threatened the integrity of federal judicial operations, with implications for national security given the targeting of judges and court systems.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Cyber ExtortionData BreachRansomwareSocial EngineeringUnauthorized Access
MOTIVATION
Financial GainData Theft for ExtortionDisruption of Critical Infrastructure
IMPACT
Financial Loss: $115 million (ransom payments)Personnel data (names, usernames, telephone numbers)Federal judge subpoenasThousands of names, titles, and work locations of U.S. Courts usersCustomer account information (requested via financial services provider)U.S. Federal Court NetworkSeven victim companies (unnamed)Transport for London (2023)47 U.S. entitiesCompanies in insurance, retail, and aviation industriesWidespread disruption to U.S. businessesDisruption to critical infrastructureFederal court system compromiseEmergency disclosure requests to financial services providersHigh (targeting of federal systems and critical infrastructure)Public association with Scattered Spider's high-profile attacksPotential lawsuits from affected entitiesRegulatory scrutiny for U.S. Courts and victim companiesHigh (PII of court personnel and users exposed)Moderate (customer account information requested via financial services provider)
DATA BREACH
Personally Identifiable Information (PII)Employment RecordsJudicial SubpoenasCustomer Account InformationNumber Of Records Exposed: Thousands (exact number unspecified)Sensitivity Of Data: High (includes PII of federal employees and judicial records)Data Exfiltration: Yes (downloaded from U.S. Courts network)Data Encryption: Yes (used in ransomware attacks)Personnel databasesEmail inboxes (including federal judges)Subpoena documentsNamesUsernamesTelephone numbersTitlesWork locations
JUNE 2020
764Before Incident
Breach
16 Jun 2020AOUSC
United States Federal Judiciary (CM/ECF System)

Breach of the United States Federal Judiciary’s Electronic Case Filing System (CM/ECF)

689After Incident
CRITICAL-75
ADM758081525
A breach in the United States federal judiciary’s CM/ECF (Case Management/Electronic Case Files) system, discovered around July 4, compromised sealed court records, potentially exposing the identities of confidential informants and cooperating witnesses across multiple states. The attack forced some courts to revert to paper-filing backups, disrupting judicial operations. Reports suggest Russia-linked hackers exploited unpatched software vulnerabilities—some dating back five years—from a prior 2020 breach under the Trump administration. The exposed data may include criminal dockets, arrest warrants, and sealed indictments, though the full scope remains unclear over a month after detection. Security experts criticize the lack of transparency and insufficient logging to reconstruct the attack, raising concerns about repeated targeting of a critical judicial system. The breach risks endangering lives (e.g., witnesses in sensitive cases) and undermining public trust in federal judicial security.
INCIDENT DETAILS -
TYPE
Data BreachUnauthorized AccessExploitation of Known Vulnerabilities
MOTIVATION
EspionageIntelligence gatheringCompromise of sensitive legal proceedings
IMPACT
Sealed court recordsConfidential informant identitiesCooperating witness identitiesCriminal docketsArrest warrantsSealed indictmentsCase Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) systemBackup paper-filing systems (activated as contingency)Downtime: Ongoing (as of August 2024, partial disruptions persist)Court operations disruptedTransition to manual paper filingsDelayed legal proceedingsErosion of public trust in federal judiciary cybersecurityCriticism over repeated breaches (2020 and 2024)Potential lawsuits from exposed individuals (e.g., informants, witnesses)Violations of confidentiality agreementsHigh (for confidential informants and witnesses)Risk of retaliation or physical harm
DATA BREACH
Legal documentsSealed recordsPersonally identifiable information (PII) of informants/witnessesCriminal case detailsSensitivity Of Data: Extremely High (national security, witness protection, ongoing investigations)Data Exfiltration: Suspected (but unconfirmed)PDF (court filings)Database records (case management)Text documents (indictments, warrants)Names of confidential informantsWitness identitiesCase participant details

Frequently Asked Questions

?
What is the current A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score for AOUSC ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in June 2026 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in May 2026 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in April 2026 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in March 2026 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in February 2026 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in January 2026 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in December 2025 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in November 2025 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in October 2025 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in September 2025 ?
?
What was AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score in August 2025 ?
?
What is the average per-incident point impact on AOUSC's A.I Rankiteo Cyber Score over the past 12 months ?
?
Where can I access detailed records of all cyber incidents associated with AOUSC ?
?
Where can I find a summary of the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
?
Where can I view AOUSC's profile page on Rankiteo ?
?
How accurate is the A.I Rankiteo Risk Scoring methodology ?
Administrative Office of the United States Courts Cyber Scoring History | Rankiteo