Administrative Office of the United States Courts Company Cyber Security Posture
uscourts.govThe Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO) is the administrative arm of the federal Judiciary, and provides a broad range of legislative, legal, financial, technology, management, and program support services to federal courts. The Administrative Office is responsible for carrying out policies approved by the Judicial Conference, the federal Judiciary’s policy-making body. The AO also provides staff support and counsel to the Judicial Conference and its committees. The diverse group of employees strives to be the most effective service organization in government – a team that is trusted, respected, and accountable. We invite you to learn more about us and join the people who work to help ensure equal justice under the law.
AOUSC Company Details
administrative-office-of-the-united-states-courts
834 employees
5055.0
922
Administration of Justice
uscourts.gov
Scan still pending
ADM_7011370
In-progress
AOUSC Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
AOUSC Global Score.png)
Administrative Office of the United States Courts Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Administrative Office of the United States Courts Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Administrative Office of the United States Courts (AOUSC) | Breach | 100 | 5 | 8/2025 | ADM413080825 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: The US federal judiciary's case management system was breached by sophisticated threat actors, exposing sensitive court documents across multiple states. The attack compromised confidential informants' identities in criminal cases and other protected information, such as minors' details. Nation-state actors are suspected. The judiciary is implementing stricter access controls and working to mitigate the impact on affected litigants. This incident follows previous attacks on court systems, highlighting the judiciary as a prime target for espionage, disruption, and extortion. | |||||||
| U.S. Federal Judiciary | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 8/2025 | ADM805080825 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: The U.S. Federal Judiciary confirmed a cyberattack on its electronic case management systems, which host confidential court documents. While most documents are public, sealed filings containing sensitive information, including identities of confidential informants, were exposed. The attack targeted CM/ECF and PACER, the backbone of federal court document management. The Judiciary is enhancing security measures to block future attacks and mitigate the impact on litigants. The breach was discovered on July 4, 2025, and involved sophisticated and persistent cyber threats. | |||||||
| U.S. Federal Courts | Breach | 100 | 5 | 8/2025 | ADM806080825 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: The U.S. federal court system experienced a major cyberattack on its case management system, PACER, which contains highly sensitive and sealed documents. The attack exposed vulnerabilities that could have led to the exposure of confidential informants' identities in criminal cases. Officials reported blocking around 200 million harmful cyber events in the 2024 fiscal year, highlighting the persistent and sophisticated nature of the threats. The judiciary is prioritizing security enhancements to mitigate future risks and protect sensitive information. | |||||||
Administrative Office of the United States Courts Company Subsidiaries
The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts (AO) is the administrative arm of the federal Judiciary, and provides a broad range of legislative, legal, financial, technology, management, and program support services to federal courts. The Administrative Office is responsible for carrying out policies approved by the Judicial Conference, the federal Judiciary’s policy-making body. The AO also provides staff support and counsel to the Judicial Conference and its committees. The diverse group of employees strives to be the most effective service organization in government – a team that is trusted, respected, and accountable. We invite you to learn more about us and join the people who work to help ensure equal justice under the law.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
AOUSC Cyber Security News
US Federal Judiciary Tightens Security Following Escalated Cyber-Attacks
The US federal judiciary has announced stronger cybersecurity protections for sensitive court documents following “recent escalated ...
US federal judiciary agency hit by 'escalated cyber attacks' which exposed highly sensitive data
The US federal judiciary agency has fallen victim to what it is calling 'escalated cyber attacks' targeting its electronic case filing ...
Federal court filing system hit in sweeping hack
The identities of confidential court informants are feared compromised in a series of breaches across multiple U.S. states.
Hackers Breach US Federal Courts, Expose Informant IDs and Sealed Docs
Hackers breached U.S. federal court systems CM/ECF and PACER, exposing sensitive data like informant identities and sealed documents across ...
Information Systems and Cybersecurity – Annual Report 2023
The Judiciary is committed to maintaining secure, robust, and flexible technology systems that meet the changing needs of judges, court staff, and the public.
Federal Courts Said to Suffer Hack Similar to Earlier Breach (1)
The federal judiciary has suffered a cyberattack that targeted similar vulnerabilities exploited in another hack five years ago, ...
The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election
This year, however, a new threat to free and fair elections has emerged: the federal government itself. The Trump administration has launched a ...
US federal court filing system breached in sweeping hack, Politico reports
The U.S. federal judiciary's electronic case filing system has been compromised in a sweeping hack that is believed to have exposed ...
Information Systems and Cybersecurity – Annual Report 2021
File a Case (CM/ECF) Attorneys and other filers can submit files to the court electronically using the CM/ECF system. File a Case (CM/ECF) Attorneys and other ...
AOUSC Similar Companies
Matos & Associados - Advogados
O escritório, constituído em 1990, está sediado no Rio de Janeiro/RJ e possui especialização no Direito da Propriedade Intelectual, reunindo a experiência de advogados e técnicos com comprovada prática em sua área de atuação. Através da qualidade técnica e de atendimento personalizado, o escritório
Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court
The Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court is located in downtown Cleveland, Ohio. With 34 Judges and more than 500 employees, we are are the largest court in the State of Ohio. There are job opportunities for those with a law degree, as well as those who have an interest in the justice system.
Rechtbank Amsterdam
De rechtbank Amsterdam behandelt rechtszaken in eerste aanleg, oftewel zaken die nog niet eerder bij de rechter zijn geweest. Onder het werkgebied vallen de gemeenten Amsterdam, Aalsmeer, Amstelveen, Diemen, Ouder-Amstel en Uithoorn. De rechtbank behandelt zaken in de rechtsgebieden civiel recht (
U.S. District Court, District of South Dakota
ABOUT THE COURT The U.S. District Court for District of South Dakota was established in 1889 when the Dakota Territory was divided into North and South Dakota. The Court handles issues pertaining to federal law within the state of South Dakota and has courthouses in Sioux Falls, Rapid City, Pierre,
Greenwood County
The mission in my particular office is to assist the public to the best of our ability. We handle traffic, criminal, and civil court. My particular area of expertise is Civil Court. Which consists of Summons & Complaint, Claim & Delivery, and Evicition filings. We treat everyone with respect and
Oliveira, Pena Cal e Sodré Advogados
Fundado por jovens mas já experientes profissionais, Oliveira, Pena Cal e Sodré Advogados já acumula através de seus sócios um grande conhecimento do cenário jurídico-econômico baiano e brasileiro. Criado em meio a um contínuo processo de crescimento da economia baiana, o Escritório veio atender às
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
AOUSC CyberSecurity History Information
How many cyber incidents has AOUSC faced?
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, AOUSC has faced 3 incidents in the past.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at AOUSC?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred incidents Breach and Cyber Attack.
How does AOUSC detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through incident response plan activated with True and enhanced monitoring with True and incident response plan activated with True and containment measures with Stricter access controls and remediation measures with Enhancing security of the system and recovery measures with Working with courts to mitigate impact on litigants and communication strategy with Published statement and enhanced monitoring with True and incident response plan activated with Yes and containment measures with Restricting access to sensitive documents and remediation measures with Implementing more rigorous procedures for document access.
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach
Title: Cyberattack on U.S. Federal Court's Case Management System
Description: U.S. federal court officials reported escalated cyberattacks on their case management system, potentially exposing sensitive documents and confidential informant identities. The system, PACER, is considered highly vulnerable and in need of replacement due to cyber risks.
Type: Cyberattack, Data Breach
Incident : Cyberattack
Title: Cyberattack on U.S. Federal Judiciary's Electronic Case Management Systems
Description: The U.S. Federal Judiciary confirms that it suffered a cyberattack on its electronic case management systems hosting confidential court documents and is strengthening cybersecurity measures.
Date Detected: 2025-07-04
Type: Cyberattack
Incident : Data Breach
Title: Cyberattack on US Federal Judiciary Case Management System
Description: The US federal judiciary announced stronger cybersecurity protections for sensitive court documents following escalated cyber-attacks on its case management system. The breach exposed sensitive court documents in multiple US states, with nation-state actors suspected of involvement.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-08-07
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Nation-state actors (suspected)
Motivation: Espionage, disruption, or influence
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach ADM806080825
Data Compromised: sensitive documents, potential exposure of confidential informant identities
Systems Affected: Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER)
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Data Compromised: sensitive case documents, identities of confidential informants
Systems Affected: CM/ECF, PACER
Operational Impact: Mitigation efforts with courts to reduce impact on litigants
Identity Theft Risk: High
Incident : Data Breach ADM413080825
Data Compromised: Confidential court documents, identities of confidential informants
Systems Affected: Federal core case management system
Operational Impact: Mitigation efforts to restrict access to sensitive documents
Brand Reputation Impact: Potential distrust in the US government
Identity Theft Risk: High (confidential informants and protected identities)
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are sensitive documents, sealed materials, sensitive case documents, identities of confidential informants, Confidential court documents and identities of confidential informants.
Which entities were affected by each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach ADM806080825
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Judicial
Location: United States
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Entity Type: Government Agency
Industry: Judicial
Location: United States
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach ADM806080825
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Enhanced Monitoring: True
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Incident Response Plan Activated: True
Containment Measures: Stricter access controls
Remediation Measures: Enhancing security of the system
Recovery Measures: Working with courts to mitigate impact on litigants
Communication Strategy: Published statement
Enhanced Monitoring: True
Incident : Data Breach ADM413080825
Incident Response Plan Activated: Yes
Containment Measures: Restricting access to sensitive documents
Remediation Measures: Implementing more rigorous procedures for document access
What is the company's incident response plan?
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Yes.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach ADM806080825
Type of Data Compromised: sensitive documents, sealed materials
Sensitivity of Data: high
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Type of Data Compromised: sensitive case documents, identities of confidential informants
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: True
Incident : Data Breach ADM413080825
Type of Data Compromised: Confidential court documents, identities of confidential informants
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Yes
Personally Identifiable Information: Yes
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Enhancing security of the system, Implementing more rigorous procedures for document access.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII)?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through were Stricter access controls and Restricting access to sensitive documents.
Ransomware Information
How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware?
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Working with courts to mitigate impact on litigants.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach ADM806080825
Recommendations: Replace PACER with a more cyber-secure system
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Replace PACER with a more cyber-secure system.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack, Data Breach ADM806080825
Source: Politico
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Source: Politico
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Source: BleepingComputer
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Politico, and Source: Politico, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: PoliticoDate Accessed: 2024-08-06.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Investigation Status: Ongoing
Incident : Data Breach ADM413080825
Investigation Status: Ongoing
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through was Published statement.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident?
Incident : Data Breach ADM413080825
High Value Targets: Confidential court documents
Data Sold on Dark Web: Confidential court documents
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident?
Incident : Cyberattack ADM805080825
Root Causes: None
Corrective Actions: Strengthening cybersecurity measures
Incident : Data Breach ADM413080825
Root Causes: None
Corrective Actions: Implementing secure stand-alone computer systems for sensitive documents
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Strengthening cybersecurity measures, Implementing secure stand-alone computer systems for sensitive documents.
Additional Questions
General Information
Who was the attacking group in the last incident?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an Nation-state actors (suspected).
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-07-04.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2024-08-07.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were sensitive documents, potential exposure of confidential informant identities, sensitive case documents, identities of confidential informants, Confidential court documents and identities of confidential informants.
What was the most significant system affected in an incident?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were Public Access to Court Electronic Records (PACER) and CM/ECF, PACER and Federal core case management system.
Response to the Incidents
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Stricter access controls and Restricting access to sensitive documents.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were sensitive documents, potential exposure of confidential informant identities, sensitive case documents, identities of confidential informants, Confidential court documents and identities of confidential informants.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Replace PACER with a more cyber-secure system.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Politico, Politico, BleepingComputer and Politico.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Ongoing.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Strengthening cybersecurity measures, Implementing secure stand-alone computer systems for sensitive documents.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
