Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Adlice Software » SENKASADL1769023372

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (SENKASADL1769023372)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-15
Company Score Before Incident782 / 1000
Company Score After Incident767 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERSENKASADL1769023372
Type of Cyber IncidentCyber Attack
ATTACK VECTORphishing emails, fake download sites, compromised Telegram channels
DATA EXPOSEDNA
INCIDENT DATE15/06/2015
STATUSpublished

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Adlice Software's Cyber Attack and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Adlice Software Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Adlice Software breach identified under incident ID SENKASADL1769023372.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Adlice Software's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/adlice-software, the number of followers: 0, the industry type: Software Development and the number of employees: 1 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 782 and after the incident was 767 with a difference of -15 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Adlice Software and their customers.

A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Cybercriminals Weaponize Legitimate Windows Driver to Disable Security Tools in Large-Scale Attacks", has drawn attention.

A sophisticated cyberattack campaign is exploiting a trusted Windows kernel driver *truesight.sys*, part of Adlice Software’s RogueKiller antivirus, to disable endpoint detection and response (EDR) and antivirus solutions before deploying ransomware or remote access malware.

The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Windows systems (including Windows 11).

Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.

Overall, the incident is a reminder of why proactive monitoring and strong governance matter.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Phishing (T1566) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating phishing emails, fake download sites, or compromised Telegram channels and Drive-by Compromise (T1189) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating fake download sites...tricking users into running a disguised installer. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating tricking users into running a disguised installer and Command and Scripting Interpreter (T1059) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating deploys an obfuscated EDR killer module. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (T1053.005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating establishes persistence via scheduled tasks and Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (T1574.002) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating dLL side-loading. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating granting them kernel-level privileges and Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (T1543.003) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating installs the TrueSight driver as a Windows service (TCLService). Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with high confidence (100%), supported by evidence indicating disable endpoint detection and response (EDR) and antivirus solutions, Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (T1078.003) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating abusing legacy driver signing rules, Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (T1036.005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating validly signed variants of the vulnerable driver, and Modify Registry (T1112) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating kernel-level privileges to terminate security processes. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating deploying ransomware like HiddenGh0st and Inhibit System Recovery (T1490) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating terminate nearly 200 security products. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating possible data exfiltration. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.

Initial Access
Phishing (90%)
Drive-by Compromise (80%)
Execution
User Execution: Malicious File (90%)
Command and Scripting Interpreter (70%)
Persistence
Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (90%)
Hijack Execution Flow: DLL Side-Loading (90%)
Privilege Escalation
Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (90%)
Create or Modify System Process: Windows Service (90%)
Defense Evasion
Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (100%)
Valid Accounts: Local Accounts (80%)
Masquerading: Match Legitimate Name or Location (90%)
Modify Registry (70%)
Impact
Data Encrypted for Impact (90%)
Inhibit System Recovery (80%)
Exfiltration
Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (70%)

Sources & References