What is the official website of ABA Family Law Section ?

The official website of ABA Family Law Section is https://www.americanbar.org/groups/family_law/.

What is ABA Family Law Section's cybersecurity risk score?

ABA Family Law Section has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 751 out of 1000, indicating a Fair security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has ABA Family Law Section experienced?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has ABA Family Law Section been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does ABA Family Law Section have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does ABA Family Law Section have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does ABA Family Law Section comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does ABA Family Law Section have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does ABA Family Law Section comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, ABA Family Law Section is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does ABA Family Law Section have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,ABA Family Law Section is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does ABA Family Law Section operate in ?

ABA Family Law Section operates primarily in the Legal Services industry.

How many employees does ABA Family Law Section have ?

ABA Family Law Section employs approximately None employees people worldwide.

Does ABA Family Law Section own any subsidiaries ?

ABA Family Law Section presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does ABA Family Law Section have ?

ABA Family Law Section's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 380 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for ABA Family Law Section ?

ABA Family Law Section is classified under the NAICS code 5411, which corresponds to Legal Services.

Does ABA Family Law Section have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, ABA Family Law Section does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does ABA Family Law Section have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, ABA Family Law Section maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/aba-family-law.

How many cybersecurity incidents has ABA Family Law Section experienced ?

As of July 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that ABA Family Law Section has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does ABA Family Law Section have ?

ABA Family Law Section has an estimated 7,910 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has ABA Family Law Section faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

AFLS

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

751

/1000

Fair

776

/1000

Fair

ABA Family Law Section Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

americanbar.org

Add Your Compliance Badge

AFLS A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

AFLS

ABA Family Law Section CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

ABA Family Law Sect...

Breach

100

04/2023

AME13529523

ABA Family Law Sect...

Breach

6/2018

AME854072825

Loading…

A.I.

AFLS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for AFLS

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABA Family Law Section in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABA Family Law Section in 2026.

Incident Types AFLS vs Legal Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ABA Family Law Section in 2026.

Incident History - AFLS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

ABA Family Law Section Subsidiaries

AFLS

Legal Services

Website: https://www.americanbar.org/groups/family_law/

Company Size: None employees

American Bar AssociationLegal Services

ABA Law Practice DivisionProfessional Organizations

ABA Young Lawyers DivisionLegal Services

ABA Litigation SectionLegal Services

ABA for Law StudentsLaw Practice

ABA Business Law SectionLegal Services

Loading…

ABA Family Law Section Similar Companies

Loading…

NEWS

ABA Family Law Section CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

March 06, 2026 02:00 PM

ABA News & Insights

The Department of Justice on Friday attacked the federal judiciary, accusing judges who ruled against the Trump administration of...

Read Article

October 09, 2025 07:00 AM

Hackers gained access to 'small number' of attorney emails at Williams & Connolly, firm confirms

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

May 12, 2025 07:00 AM

Lead With Your Values: Jill Rhodes, CISO, Option Care Health

As the CISO of Option Care Health, Rhodes is responsible for securing the organization and its data through the integration of information...

Read Article

April 22, 2025 07:00 AM

For cybersecurity, vulnerability management, 'think of it as brushing your teeth,' IT managing director says

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

March 21, 2025 07:00 AM

How law firm leaders can identify cyber threats, leverage artificial intelligence to enhance cybersecurity

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

October 21, 2024 07:00 AM

This lawyer focused on publishing her technology law research

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

July 28, 2023 07:00 AM

Weekly Briefs: Wire-transfer fraudsters fool 3 law practices; Quinn Emanuel discloses cyberattack

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

July 12, 2023 07:00 AM

BigLaw firms are targeted in cyberattacks and hacking lawsuits

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

April 25, 2023 07:00 AM

ABA faces lawsuit over data breach

The ABA Journal is read by half of the nation's 1 million lawyers every month. It covers the trends, people and finances of the legal...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55790

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50284

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50283

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14440

SUMMARY

Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14422

SUMMARY

Out of bounds read and write in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…