Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

AB InBev GCC IndiaAB InBev GCC India
VS
UnileverUnilever
AB InBev GCC India

AB InBev GCC India

Nagavara Main Road, Bengaluru, Karnataka, 560045, IN

Last Update: 20/03/2026

View Profile
775/1000Fair

AB InBev is a multinational beverage and brewing company headquartered in Leuven, Belgium with an outstanding portfolio of over 500 brands and countless beer varieties. We are committed to driving growth that improves the lives of people across the globe. As a company,...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:1,386
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Unilever

Unilever

100 Victoria Embankment, Blackfriars, London, GB, EC4Y 0DY

Last Update: 03/10/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.unilever.com
790/1000Fair

Every day, 3.4 billion people around the world enjoy our products - from ground-breaking brands like Hellmann's, Domestos, Dove and Rexona (to name just a few). Our brands lead the way - innovating in their fields, delighting their consumers and powering our business fo...

NAICS:30
NAICS Definition:Manufacturing
Employees:130,813
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
AB InBev GCC India

AB InBev GCC India

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Unilever

Unilever

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AB InBev GCC India in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Unilever in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - AB InBev GCC India (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AB InBev GCC India cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Unilever (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Unilever cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
AB InBev GCC India

AB InBev GCC India

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Unilever

Unilever

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNIMICASTFLORHO1772483656

FAQ

Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between AB InBev GCC India company and Unilever company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between AB InBev GCC India and Unilever, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between AB InBev GCC India and Unilever, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - AB InBev GCC India or Unilever ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - AB InBev GCC India or Unilever ?
Between AB InBev GCC India and Unilever, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between AB InBev GCC India and Unilever, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97626
SUMMARY

Requesting a user or organization profile page (`GET /{username}`) with an `Accept: application/rss+xml` or `Accept: application/atom+xml` header returned the owner's activity feed without the visibility check that the profile page and the `.rss` and `.atom` routes apply. Anonymous users, restricted users and non-members could confirm the existence of limited or private users and private organizations and read their profile details and public activity, also when `[other] ENABLE_FEED` was disabled. Activity in private repositories was not included.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97208
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint for creating push mirrors (`POST /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/push_mirrors`) checked only whether mirroring was enabled and not the `[mirror] DISABLE_NEW_PUSH` setting that the web interface enforces. A repository administrator could therefore create new push mirrors on instances where the site administrator had disabled them. A push mirror pushes all refs of the repository to a remote chosen by the caller, on each commit or on a schedule.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96594
SUMMARY

The Gitea API endpoint `GET /api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/media/{filepath}` wrote files of up to 1 KiB that are stored directly in Git, not in LFS, to the response without the content type and disposition headers Gitea uses for user content. An HTML file committed to a repository was therefore rendered by the browser on the Gitea origin. A user who can push to a repository could run JavaScript in the session of a victim who opens the media URL and act with the victim's permissions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-89182
SUMMARY

With `[repository] FORCE_PRIVATE = true`, Gitea creates new repositories as private, but the post-receive hook still applied the `repo.private=false` push option to an empty repository created by push. Any user who can create repositories could make their new repository public in violation of the instance policy. The default configuration is not affected.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86684
SUMMARY

The Gitea push mirror API checked whether the repository owner, instead of the requesting user, may use local file system paths. On instances with `[security] IMPORT_LOCAL_PATHS = true`, a repository administrator who is not allowed to import local paths could add a push mirror to a local path on the server when the repository owner has that permission. Gitea then pushed the repository's refs into an existing Git repository at that path with the permissions of the Gitea process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-06
UPDATED
Date2026-10-06
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA