What is the official website of PAG ?

The official website of PAG is http://www.pag.com.

What is PAG's cybersecurity risk score?

PAG has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 749 out of 1000, indicating a Moderate security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has PAG experienced?

According to Rankiteo, PAG currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has PAG been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, PAG has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does PAG have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, PAG is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does PAG have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, PAG does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does PAG comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, PAG is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does PAG have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, PAG does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does PAG comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, PAG is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does PAG have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,PAG is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does PAG operate in ?

PAG operates primarily in the Investment Management industry.

How many employees does PAG have ?

PAG employs approximately 418 people worldwide.

Does PAG own any subsidiaries ?

PAG presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does PAG have ?

PAG's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 23,646 followers.

Does PAG have a Crunchbase profile ?

Yes, PAG has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/pag.

Does PAG have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, PAG maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/_pag.

How many cybersecurity incidents has PAG experienced ?

As of October 20, 2026, Rankiteo reports that PAG has not experienced any cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does PAG have ?

PAG has an estimated 5,452 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

PAG

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

749

/1000

Moderate

774

/1000

Fair

PAG Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

pag.com

cb in

Add Your Compliance Badge

About PAG PAG is a leading alternative investment firm focused on APAC with three core strategies: Credit & Markets, Private Equity, and Real Assets. We manage capital on behalf of nearly 300 institutional fund investors, including some of the most sophisticated global asset allocators. PAG has more than 300 investment professionals in 15 key offices globally and manages approximately USD55 billion in assets. Firm History PAG is a leading diversified alternative investment firm with three major businesses: Credit & Markets (CM), Real Assets (RA), and Private Equity (PE). The history of PAG dates back more than two decades. PAG RA originated from Secured Capital founded by JP Toppino in 1997. CM grew out of Pacific Alliance Group, founded

PAG

PAG CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

No data available

Loading…

A.I.

PAG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for PAG

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PAG in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PAG in 2026.

Incident Types PAG vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PAG in 2026.

Incident History - PAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

PAG Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PAG

Investment Management

Website: http://www.pag.com

Company Size: 418

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

PAG Similar Companies

Sonae

sonae.pt

Sonae exists to create a lasting positive impact on businesses, people, communities and on the planet. Managing a diverse portfolio of businesses in retail, financial services, technology, investments, real estate and telecommunications, Sonae makes the most of its expertise and pushes itself to create the future we all want and need. Creating today a better tomorrow, for all.

Odebrecht

novonor.com.br

Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on five continents. As part of their entrepreneurial responsibility while serving clients and local communities, they contribute to the development of economically prosperous, socially just, environmentally sustainable, politically inclusive and culturally rich societies and countries.

Essar

essar.com

Essar, with an entrepreneurial track record spanning 50+ years, specialises in investing and developing assets to create value in core sectors such as Energy, Infrastructure, Metals & Mining, and Technology & Retail. With a presence in eight countries, Essar generates revenues of US$15 billion and provides employment for over 7,000 people. Over the past five years, Essar has strategically rebalanced its portfolio by monetising some world-class assets. Essar is now positioned to transition its existing assets to a greener regime and invest in businesses driving the transformation of sector landscapes from carbon-centric to a clean energy ecosystem, both nationally and globally. The Group is developing sustainable assets and industry ecosystems, with a particular focus on hydrogen, green mobility, and green steel. Essar Foundation, the CSR arm of Essar, has a rich 50-year heritage of service across India, focusing on areas such as health, education, livelihood, women empowerment, sports, environment, and infrastructure.

Sabanci Holding

sabanci.com

Sabancı Holding is one of Turkey’s leading conglomerate, engaged in a wide variety of business activities through its subsidiaries and affiliates, mainly in the banking, financial services, energy, industrials, building materials and retail sectors. Our Group companies most of which are leaders in their respective sectors. As Sabancı Group, we position ourselves in new economy, with global partnerships, employment for 60 thousand, and reaching more than 40 million people on 5 continents. We invest in energy & climate, material and digital technologies, through an agile global footprint to design a sustainable future with a goal of achieving 'Net Zero' by 2050. We stride confidently towards the future through Sabancı of New Generation culture and our purpose driven, stakeholder oriented, agile and diverse organization. We are committed to ensuring equal rights and opportunities to foster a positive and an inclusive work environment and to contribute to the socio economic development of the community. With tens of thousands of talents, stakeholders and investments in multiple businesses worldwide, what connects us is our purpose: We unite Turkey and the World for a sustainable life with leading enterprises.

Ackermans & van Haaren

avh.be

Ackermans & van Haaren is a diversified group active in 4 core sectors: Marine Engineering & Contracting (DEME, one of the largest dredging companies in the world - CFE, a construction group with headquarters in Belgium), Private Banking (Delen Private Bank, one of the largest independent private asset managers in Belgium, and asset manager JM Finn in the UK - Bank J.Van Breda & C°, niche bank for entrepreneurs and liberal professions in Belgium), Real Estate & Senior Care (Nextensa, a Euronext-listed land and real estate developer focused on Belgium and Luxembourg) and Energy & Resources (SIPEF, an agro-industrial group in tropical agriculture). In 2023, through its share in its participations, the AvH group represented a turnover of 6.5 billion euros and employed 21,887 people. The group concentrates on a limited number of strategic participations with significant potential for growth. The AvH share is part of the BEL20 index, the BEL-ESG index of Euronext Brussels and the European DJ Stoxx 600.

Loading…

NEWS

PAG CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

December 23, 2025 08:00 AM

Personal Cybersecurity Tips for Seniors: Protect Your Online Life

Older adults face growing cybersecurity risks online. Learn practical steps to strengthen your digital security, including safe password...

Read Article

December 08, 2025 08:00 AM

Kuwait and NATO deepen strategic ties as AI, Cybersecurity dominate regional security talks

Sheikh Jarrah Jaber Al-Ahmad Al-Sabah highlighted the significance of holding the meeting at the NATO Regional Center in Kuwait — “the first...

Read Article

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM

Sneaky2FA Phishing Page Integrates Browser-in-the-Browser Tactics

The Sneaky2FA phishing page now uses Browser-in-the-Browser techniques and advanced evasion methods to bypass security tools and compromise...

Read Article

October 27, 2025 07:00 AM

Automakers urged to strengthen cybersecurity after JLR shutdown

JLR's 40-day cyber shutdown shows automakers must strengthen IT and factory security to prevent costly production disruptions.

Read Article

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM

Oracle E-Business Suite exploitation traced back as early as July

Researchers say an extortion campaign linked to the Clop ransomware group used a series of chained vulnerabilities and sophisticated...

Read Article

October 10, 2025 07:00 AM

US senators urged to visit Pagasa Island

US senators should visit Pagasa Island to affirm the superpower's support for the territorial struggle of its oldest treaty ally in Asia.

Read Article

September 24, 2025 07:00 AM

JLR extends shutdown until Oct. 1 as cyberattack investigation continues

Jaguar Land Rover extends production halt to Oct. 1 after cyberattack disrupts operations and compromises company data.

Read Article

September 22, 2025 07:00 AM

Stellantis reports data breach at third-party platform affecting North American customers

Stellantis confirmed on Sunday that unauthorized access occurred to a third-party platform that supports its U.S. customer service.

Read Article

September 21, 2025 07:00 AM

DICT, CICC respond to series of cyberattacks on gov't websites amid Sept 21 rallies

A coordinated wave of cyberattacks targeted multiple government websites on September 21, coinciding with nationwide rallies against flood...

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-77684

SUMMARY

The Bluetooth Classic Hands-Free Profile HF role in subsys/bluetooth/host/classic/hfp_hf.c does not release the AT command buffers that are still queued on hf->tx_pending when the RFCOMM DLC goes down. hfp_hf_disconnected() only cancelled the work items and cleared hf->acl, and no other code path ever dequeues those buffers, so each one is permanently lost from the fixed hf_pool (CONFIG_BT_MAX_CONN + 1 buffers, i.e. two in the default configuration). The same function also left BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_CONNECTED set, and hfp_hf_create() wiped the object with memset() as soon as hf->acl was NULL, without checking whether hf->work, hf->slc_work or hf->deferred_work was still pending or running. The remote Audio Gateway peer controls the trigger end to end and needs no application involvement: an unsolicited +BCS: 1 response makes bcs_handle() call bt_hfp_hf_select_codec() and queue an AT+BCS buffer, which cannot be transmitted while BT_HFP_HF_FLAG_RX_ONGOING is set, and an immediately following RFCOMM DISC strands that buffer. Repeating the connect / +BCS / disconnect cycle a couple of times empties hf_pool for good. With the pool exhausted, HFP command sending fails permanently, and because hfp_hf_send_cmd() allocates with K_FOREVER (bt_rfcomm_create_pdu() → bt_conn_create_pdu()) from the Bluetooth RX context — where that timeout is not downgraded to K_NO_WAIT — one further +BCS from the peer parks the Bluetooth RX thread inside net_buf_alloc() with no possible waker, halting all HCI event processing until the device is rebooted. Separately, reusing the HF slot while a work handler was still queued or running allowed memset() to wipe live k_work items out from under the system workqueue, corrupting shared kernel workqueue state. Exploitation requires an established HFP session (for SSP devices L2CAP enforces authentication before the RFCOMM channel is reachable) and a build with CONFIG_BT_HFP_HF enabled.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)

cvss3

Base Score: 5.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

Impact Score

3.6

Exploitability

2.1

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19595

SUMMARY

The user-mode syscall verifier z_vrfy_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() in subsys/rtio/rtio_syscalls.c validated its two output parameters, buff and buff_len, with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_READ() rather than K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(). Both are pure out-parameters: z_impl_rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() stores the mempool buffer address and its length through them. The distinction is enforced by every architecture validator — arch_buffer_validate() on RISC-V PMP explicitly accepts the global __rom_region/__rodata_region for reads only, and the ARM MPU validators accept P_RO_U_RO and P_RW_U_RO regions for reads only — so a read-validated pointer is not necessarily writable by the calling thread. An unprivileged user-mode thread that has been granted access to an RTIO context (rtio_access_grant()) can invoke the rtio_cqe_get_mempool_buffer() syscall with buff/buff_len pointing at memory it may read but not write, and with a completion-queue entry whose flags field it fully controls (only RTIO_CQE_FLAG_MEMPOOL_BUFFER in flags[7:0] is required; flags[19:8] and flags[31:20] supply the block index and count). The kernel then performs a pointer-sized and a 4-byte store through those addresses while running in supervisor mode. Reaching the store requires CONFIG_USERSPACE together with CONFIG_RTIO_SYS_MEM_BLOCKS, the configuration behind RTIO_DEFINE_WITH_MEMPOOL; without the latter the implementation returns -ENOTSUP and writes nothing. Two outcomes follow. If the target lies in a memory-domain partition declared K_MEM_PARTITION_P_RW_U_RO (privileged read-write, user read-only), the kernel-mode store succeeds and deposits partly attacker-chosen values into memory the memory domain had marked read-only for that thread, bypassing the partition's write protection. If the target lies in globally readable but unwritable memory such as .text/.rodata in flash, the store faults in kernel mode; the fault is delivered to z_fatal_error() and the default k_sys_fatal_error_handler() halts or reboots the device, giving an unprivileged thread a reliable full denial of service. The read-permission check does bound the damage: the address must still be readable by the calling thread, so kernel-private memory cannot be targeted and no confidential data is disclosed. The fix replaces both checks with K_SYSCALL_MEMORY_WRITE(), so a thread lacking write permission is terminated by K_OOPS before the implementation runs; the cqe argument correctly remains read-validated.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.1)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:H

Impact Score

4.2

Exploitability

1.8

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-19178

SUMMARY

IBM Storage TS4500 Library 1.1.1.6 through 1.12.0.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to gain unauthorized administrative privileges due to a race condition.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.8)

cvss3

Base Score: 6.8

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N

Impact Score

5.2

Exploitability

1.6

REFERENCES

https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7292610

CVE-2026-112991

SUMMARY

The html_to_markdown expansion module in MISP Modules contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in its is_safe_url() URL validation function. The BLOCKED_RANGES list used to reject unsafe destination addresses was incomplete, omitting several critical IP address ranges. Specifically, the following ranges were not blocked: 0.0.0.0/8 (unspecified, which routes to loopback on Linux), 100.64.0.0/10 (carrier-grade NAT per RFC 6598), ::/128 (IPv6 unspecified), fc00::/7 (IPv6 Unique Local Addresses), and fe80::/10 (IPv6 link-local). The existing list only covered IPv4 loopback (127.0.0.0/8), RFC 1918 private ranges, IPv4 link-local (169.254.0.0/16), and IPv6 loopback (::1/128). An authenticated user with the ability to create or modify MISP attributes that trigger the html_to_markdown expansion module could supply URLs pointing to these unblocked internal address ranges. Because the module fetches the URL server-side to convert HTML content to Markdown, the request is made from the MISP server's network context. This allows an attacker to probe and read responses from internal services, carrier-grade NAT infrastructure, or link-local endpoints that would otherwise be unreachable from external networks. IPv4-mapped IPv6 forms (e.g., [::ffff:0.0.0.0]) also bypassed the existing checks. The security impact is primarily confidentiality: an attacker can read data served by internal services reachable from the MISP server. The MISP instance itself is not compromised, but it is abused as a proxy to access otherwise restricted network resources.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 6.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

https://github.com/misp/misp-modules/commit/98a1c2c2f297665dd8d4609e9cd644007a57516b

CVE-2026-112372

SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in H3C Magic NX15 V100R017. This affects the function importprofile of the file /api/upload. This manipulation of the argument fileName causes path traversal. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure.

Published

Date2026-10-19

Updated

Date2026-10-19

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)

cvss2

Base Score: 5.8

Complexity: LOW

AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:P/A:P

cvss3

Base Score: 6.6

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L

cvss4

Base Score: 2.0

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

3.7

Exploitability

2.3

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

PAG Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

PAG A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

PAG CyberSecurity News & History

PAG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for PAG

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types PAG vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - PAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PAG Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PAG

PAG Similar Companies

Sonae

Odebrecht

Essar

Sabanci Holding

Ackermans & van Haaren

PAG CyberSecurity News

Personal Cybersecurity Tips for Seniors: Protect Your Online Life

Kuwait and NATO deepen strategic ties as AI, Cybersecurity dominate regional security talks

Sneaky2FA Phishing Page Integrates Browser-in-the-Browser Tactics

Automakers urged to strengthen cybersecurity after JLR shutdown

Oracle E-Business Suite exploitation traced back as early as July

US senators urged to visit Pagasa Island

JLR extends shutdown until Oct. 1 as cyberattack investigation continues

Stellantis reports data breach at third-party platform affecting North American customers

DICT, CICC respond to series of cyberattacks on gov't websites amid Sept 21 rallies

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo

PAG CyberSecurity News & History

PAG Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Incident Predictions locked

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Underwriter Stats for PAG

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Incident Types PAG vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)

Incident History - PAG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PAG Subsidiaries

Parent Company

PAG

PAG Similar Companies

Sonae

Odebrecht

Essar

Sabanci Holding

Ackermans & van Haaren

PAG CyberSecurity News

Personal Cybersecurity Tips for Seniors: Protect Your Online Life

Kuwait and NATO deepen strategic ties as AI, Cybersecurity dominate regional security talks

Sneaky2FA Phishing Page Integrates Browser-in-the-Browser Tactics

Automakers urged to strengthen cybersecurity after JLR shutdown

Oracle E-Business Suite exploitation traced back as early as July

US senators urged to visit Pagasa Island

JLR extends shutdown until Oct. 1 as cyberattack investigation continues

Stellantis reports data breach at third-party platform affecting North American customers

DICT, CICC respond to series of cyberattacks on gov't websites amid Sept 21 rallies

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Access Data Using Our API

What Do We Measure ?

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Rankiteo