Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (9111778077940)
The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.
Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis
Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis
- Timeline of 911Cyber's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
- Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
- How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
- How this cyber incident impacts 911Cyber Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
- Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.
Full Incident Analysis Transcript
In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the 911Cyber breach identified under incident ID 9111778077940.
The analysis begins with a detailed overview of 911Cyber's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/911cyber, the number of followers: 2914, the industry type: Computer and Network Security and the number of employees: 5 employees
After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 748 and after the incident was 416 with a difference of -332 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.
In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on 911Cyber and their customers.
A newly reported cybersecurity incident, "Latvian Ransomware Negotiator Sentenced in Landmark Cybercrime Case", has drawn attention.
A Latvian national, Deniss Zolotarjovs (35), has been sentenced to 102 months in U.S.
The disruption is felt across the environment, affecting Over 54 organizations worldwide, including critical infrastructure (e.g., 911 emergency response system), and exposing Sensitive records, including children’s medical files, plus an estimated financial loss of $69 million (reported).
Formal response steps have not been shared publicly yet.
The case underscores how Closed (sentencing completed).
Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.
The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.
MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis
Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (60%), with evidence including targeted over 54 organizations worldwide, and disruption of critical infrastructure and Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating former Russian law enforcement recruited to access government databases. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating multiple ransomware strains (Akira, Royal, Karakurt, TommyLeaks, SchoolBoys). Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating former Conti members operated with corporate-like structure. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Valid Accounts (T1078) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating access to government databases via former law enforcement. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating used multiple ransomware strains to obscure their activities and evade detection and System Information Discovery (T1082) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating identifying the most damaging information to pressure victims. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified Unsecured Credentials: Credentials In Files (T1552.001) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating stolen data leveraged for extortion, including sensitive records. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified System Information Discovery (T1082) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating identifying the most damaging information to pressure victims and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating distributing sensitive records such as children’s medical files. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed, including medical records and sensitive personal information. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Proxy (T1090) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating operated from St. Petersburg, Russia, with international targets. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating data exfiltration confirmed, including children’s medical files. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains used for data encryption (Akira, Royal, Karakurt), Defacement: Internal Defacement (T1491.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating psychological extortion tactics to coerce victims into paying ransoms, and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating disruption of critical infrastructure, including 911 emergency response system. Under the Financial Theft tactic, the analysis identified Ransomware (T1657) with high confidence (100%), supported by evidence indicating $69 million paid by victims, financial losses exceeded $56 million. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.
Sources & References
- 911Cyber Rankiteo Cyber Incident Details: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/911cyber/incident/9111778077940
- 911Cyber CyberSecurity Rating page: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/911cyber
- 911Cyber Rankiteo Cyber Incident Blog Article: https://blog.rankiteo.com/9111778077940-911-emergency-response-system-ransomware-june-2021/
- 911Cyber CyberSecurity Score History: https://www.rankiteo.com/company/911cyber/history
- 911Cyber CyberSecurity Incident Source: https://cyberpress.org/member-of-russian-ransomware/
- Rankiteo A.I CyberSecurity Rating methodology: https://www.rankiteo.com/Images/rankiteo_algo.pdf
- Rankiteo TPRM Scoring methodology: https://static.rankiteo.com/model/rankiteo_tprm_methodology.pdf